Mobile connectivity in Africa has already arrived


This page in:

What is the main difference between high-income and developing countries?

Here is my take: People in the former have much more of pretty much everything. Almost everyone living in high-income countries has access to electricity; in poor (low-income) countries, 7 out of 10 people don’t. Most families in rich countries own a car, but only a few people living in the developing world do. On per capita basis, rich economies have 15 times more doctors than poor countries, consume 40 times more energy, have 50 times more ATMs, and so on.

Nevertheless, when it comes to mobile connectivity, rich and poor countries are increasingly looking alike. At the beginning of 2015, mobile penetration (counting unique subscribers) in developed markets was 79 percent, compared to 45 percent across the developing world. The gap among the adult (working) population is even lower since poorer societies tend to be younger (and 5-year-olds don’t need phones, yet); sub-Saharan Africa’s (SSA) mobile penetration among those older than 15 jumps to 69 percent (from 39 percent for the entire population), while Europe’s goes up to 93 percent (from 79 percent). Moreover, developing countries are rapidly catching up and the gap may virtually disappear within a decade. 

Source: World Bank. * percent of total roads

How is mobile connectivity relevant for development?

Lack of resources, be it electricity, roads, or doctors, makes it difficult for developing countries to produce goods and services that are energy intensive, need efficient land transport, or a healthy workforce. However, in today’s modern economy we are witnessing a rapidly expanding array of services with mobile technologies as their backbone. High mobile penetration gives developing economies the capacity to produce and consume these services. In 2014, mobile technologies were responsible for an estimated 3.8 percent of global GDP, of which 2 percentage points came from the associated productivity increases (just think of your drop in productivity when your cell phone battery dies). In SSA, the contribution of mobile technologies to GDP was even higher—5.4 percent. McKinsey estimates that (mobile) internet could make up 10 percent of Africa’s economy by 2025.

What can developing countries do to capitalize on mobile technologies?

The first wave of policies to promote mobile connectivity have already happened in all but a few developing countries: multiple private providers competing or having publicly-owned companies that operate on market principles. Consequently, even in the poorest countries in the world people have affordable and high-quality mobile access; 118 countries, including many developing ones, already had 4G networks in 2014, and two-thirds of the world is projected to have 4G access by 2020. High mobile penetration is a necessary, but not sufficient, precondition for maximizing the contribution of mobile connectivity to economic development. Governments should work on four areas to make the most of these mobile opportunities:

1. Expand network spectrum for mobile services. The International Telecommunication Union estimates that 1340-1960 MHz of spectrum will be needed by 2020 to meet growing demand for mobile data. Mobile penetration and use of smartphones (global mobile data is expected to increase tenfold from 2014-19) will continue to rapidly increase across the developing world, hence more spectrum is a precondition for increased penetration and lower prices. The move to digital television in many developing countries, which in turn frees up network spectrum, is a positive step in this direction.

2. Promote e-banking and e-commerce by simplifying regulations for mobile payments. Although there are 2.5 billion “unbanked” people across the developing world, only 4 percent of them, or 100 million, use mobile money (and more than quarter of these are Kenyans). Replicating Kenya’s success with M-Pesa is primarily a question of regulation and policy innovation.

3. Move toward mobile public services. Already today, there is sufficient scale in the uptake of mobile (smart) phones in most developing countries. Banks are moving online, retailers are moving online, entertainment services are online; governments are not. Introducing mobile government services could lower costs, save time for users/citizens, and reduce rent seeking opportunities in societies plagued by (petty) corruption.

4. Invest in education programs for mobile technologies (software engineering). Not every small country can expect to produce success stories like Estonia, where local entrepreneurs created Skype in 2003 (and sold it for $2.6 billion two years later). Nevertheless, investment in education is necessary to produce entrepreneurs who are going to capitalize on mobile connectivity and at the same time empower people in developing countries to address many of their social and economic needs through their phones. The number of mobile-enabled product launches in developing countries is already growing rapidly—from 200 in 2007 to 1,300 in 2012. Offering relevant training would further boost digital entrepreneurship. The m:lab East Africa project is an excellent example of public-private partnership to promote education, training, and mobile entrepreneurship.
Developing country governments need to continue to work hard to fill their infrastructure gaps in order to move up the development ladder, but at the same time they can capitalize now on their greatest infrastructure asset—mobile phones. They are too great of an opportunity to miss.

This blog was originally published on March 18, 2015, on the Brookings Institution’s Future Development blog


Join the Conversation

Henri Josserand
May 21, 2015

Greetings; the original post is a bit old, but I will submit a short comment because the subject is so timely and interesting. It's been said that the "cell phone revolution" has been in SSA a lot more widespread and game-changing than the computer revolution. I work in SSA a fair bit and it's really hard now to find someone, even in the most remote pastoral areas, who does not have even the cheapest and simplest cell phone. In addition to the economic benefits mentioned in the post, such as MPESA, of course, cell phones have begun to help with the dissemination of market price information, and even seasonal and short-term weather forecasts that smallholders can use to customize their seed choices and farming practices. One should also recognize advances made by African software engineers or designers (applications in Kenya, the medicine validation application from Ghana, and many others). I think, as usual, vested political and economic interests stand in the way of further development, but this will not discourage people forever, especially if they start using cell phones to organize and mobilize themselves to push for change.

Johanes Makodiah
July 17, 2015

I am in total Agreement. In my Msc project entitled"The Role of Mobile phone communication in Diffusion of Dairy Goat rearing in Mutonguni division, Kitui West county, Kenya", One of my findings was that those farmers who had used mobile phones longer had higher survival rates of their goats and reaped more benefits than their colleagues who did not own or had access to mobile phones.They had higher income and better living standards.