Syndicate content

Research and Policy Development

Policy to research to policy in difficult places

Humanity Journal's picture

This post was written by Alex de Waal, the Executive Director of the World Peace Foundation and a Research Professor at The Fletcher School. It is a contribution to an online symposium on the changing nature of knowledge production in fragile states. Be sure to read other entries by Deval Desai and Rebecca TapscottLisa Denney and Pilar Domingo, Michael WoolcockMorten Jerven.

UNAMID Police Officer Patrols IDP Camp in DarfurThere’s a commendable search for rigor in social science. But there’s also an illusion that numbers ipso facto represent rigor, and that sophisticated mathematical analysis of the social scientific datasets can expand the realm of explanatory possibilities. Social scientific researchers working in what the Justice and Security Research Programme calls “difficult places”—countries affected by armed conflict, political turbulence and the long-lasting uncertainties that follow protracted crisis—should be extremely cautious before setting off on this path.

There’s a simultaneous search for policy relevance: for bridging the gap between the academy and the executive. We want our research to be useful and to be used; we want policy-makers to listen to us. But we risk becoming entrapped in a self-referential knowledge creating machine.

The holy grail seems to be to emulate economists and epidemiologists, whose highly technical analyses of real world data—and in the case of the latter, double-blind clinical trials—set a gold standard in terms of methodological rigor, alongside a truly enviable record of influencing policy and practice. But before embarking on this quest, it would be advisable to examine what social scientific scholarship might look like, if it actually reached this goal.

Research Is Not An End In Itself

Naniette Coleman's picture

Arne Hoel

مع احتفالنا باليوم الدولي للمرأة عام 2018، ليس هناك حاجة أكثر من الوقت الحالي للاستثمار في البشر، لا سيما النساء والفتيات. فقد أصبحت المهارات والمعارف والخبرات - التي تسمى مجتمعة رأس المال البشري- تشكل نسبة هائلة من الثروة العالمية، أكبر من رأس المال المُنتج كالمصانع أو الصناعة أو الموارد الطبيعية.

لكن ثروة رأس المال البشري ليست موزعة بالتساوي في العالم، وتشكل شريحة أكبر من الثروة مع تطور البلدان. كيف يمكن إذن للبلدان النامية أن تبني رأسمالها البشري وتستعد لمستقبل أكثر تطلبا من الناحية التكنولوجية؟