Syndicate content

Add new comment

Adam, You have made a case for modifying the old aggregate MDGs, to assure that they properly reflect inequalities in the relevant dimensions. Doing this in a sensible way would not create a "dog's breakfast" of conceptually muddled indicators--quite the opposite. Essentially one would be adding indicators for the health and education of poor people. I would go further and propose that we replace the present aggregate indicators by those for the poor. And we have the data needed. But don't you agree that simply adding one or more ad hoc aggregate "inequality" indices (as is being proposed by some observers)does risk creating such a muddle? Martin Ravallion