It has been a long time since I’ve written, but the past two months have been quite hectic for us! I just returned from China, where we were working with the capital market supervisor, and the issue of the financial sector regulatory architecture, or how market supervisors should be organized, was a topic of discussion. In early June, there was a conference with all of the key financial supervisors on the topic of integrated regulation and supervision, and again, the policy makers are keenly focused on this issue now.
Across Asia, this topic has largely been in the background since the years immediately following the Asian crisis in 1997-1998. However, the sub-prime mortgage crisis in the United States, beginning in the summer of 2007, has once again brought this issue to the forefront of policy discussions among Asian financial supervisors, particularly those in the developing economies. Given the global turmoil and the new domestic challenges in emerging Asia (i.e., high inflation, rapid credit growth, and equity market turbulence, etc.), effective supervision of financial institutions and markets is clearly a hot topic.
This most recent financial crisis unfolded rapidly, impacted the largest and most sophisticated financial institutions in the world, and the duration and ultimate ramifications of the crisis is still unknown. In Asia, the direct exposures of financial institutions to sub-prime-related instruments and risks appear to have been limited as most institutions were not active in this market segment. In addition, the financial markets in Asia have not witnessed the same level of financial innovation as in the US and Europe with a more limited range of complex structured products.