Thanks for your comment, Greg. It is certainly our aim to provide the best possible advice. But what good is even the best possible advice if it is not implementable? So agreed that any strategy also needs to incorporate features that facilitate implementation. Some further thoughts on this: International best practices - as often propagated by places like the World Bank - offer common principles that may be useful in various settings, but in the end implementation will need to be heterodox. Helicoptering in external advice without regard to local circumstances generally doesn't work and may lead to paper reforms that copy the form but don't accomplish the function. It helps to zoom in on the few critical binding constraints to growth rather than trying to implement an endless list of reforms. Prioritization on reforms that deliver the best bang for buck ensures that scarce political capital is spent wisely -- else reform fatigue may set in quickly. Proper sequencing of reforms may help alleviate transition costs and hence opposition to reform. For example, ensuring a pro-growth safety net is in place will assist with the implementation of competition policy and labor market reforms. Experimentation and experiential learning are key to ensure that early success, where demonstrated, can be amplified and failures can be corrected early on. Bottom-up feedback throughout the process of reform implementation can make a big difference to outcomes in this way.