Syndicate content

Less is sometimes more: Public finance reform in Kiribati

Tobias Haque's picture

Kiribati isn’t your usual country. It’s unusually beautiful, for a start, especially from the air, on a bright clear day, with the dazzling blues and greens of tropical sea and jungle. Its geography is also unusual, consisting of 32 atolls, and one coral island, spread over an almost-inconceivable 3.5 million square kilometers of ocean. The highest point on the main island, Tarawa, is a mere 3 meters above sea level, and driving down the country’s largest road, you can frequently see ocean on both sides. Kiribati is one of the smallest countries in the world, with a population of just over 100,000 people, and the country is also poor – with average incomes of around $1,800 per year.


In a country so unique, I was happy to be involved in some reform efforts that were both innovative and context-appropriate during my visit a few weeks ago. I represented the World Bank at a donor workshop on public finance reform, with bilateral and multilateral agencies trying to assist the Government of Kiribati in building better systems and processes for collecting revenue, and using it to best effect in delivering public services – while also avoiding wastage and corruption, and ensuring that the Government spends no more than it can afford.


Kiribati, one of the smallest countries in the world, is unusually beautiful.

With public finance, there is always more that can be done - upgrading accounting standards, ensuring regular cash reconciliations, across-the-board auditing of public financial accounts, improving procurement processes. After all, it’s tempting to take the systems we have in wealthier countries as models, and assume that differences are shortfalls. Scorecards that are sometimes applied by donor agencies to assess systems in developing countries encourage this approach, with higher scores being granted to countries that have systems that look most like those in bigger, richer countries. But is a public finance system like the ones we have in large wealthy countries appropriate for very small, less developed countries?


Often it isn’t, as I think anyone visiting Kiribati can quickly see. The Government of Kiribati has only a few qualified accountants. Up until a few months ago, there were eight unfilled vacancies in the Ministry of Finance – which has a total staff of just 25.  It’s not that there aren’t smart people. It’s just that, in such a small country, the smart people have a lot to do, and lack the time needed to train for and focus on very specialized tasks and functions – like auditing accounts, building financial databases, managing procurement systems, ensuring compliance with international accounting standards, and conducting tax assessments. Countries like Kiribati just don’t have enough people to do things in the same way as bigger, wealthier countries. And this applies not just in relation to public finance systems, but in many areas of public administration and service delivery.


Our donor workshop ended with common agreement that a more context-specific approach to public finance reform is needed - that Kiribati won’t be able to reach international “good practice” in all areas. But, also, that it probably doesn’t need to. By focusing on a few key steps that address real problems being experienced by the government – falling revenues and poorly performing SOEs – Kiribati can make sure that it is putting its scarce human and financial resources to use on fixing problems that really matter – and not just trying (and inevitably failing) to put in place systems that look the same as those used in far bigger, richer, countries, that face very different issues. And international assistance will always be available to Kiribati to do some of those things that really must be done, but for which there aren’t enough trained local staff available.


Sure, with a very targeted approach focusing on the basics, and continuing to rely on external assistance in some key areas, public finance systems in Kiribati won’t look like those in other countries. But unusual isn’t necessarily a bad thing.


Submitted by Anonymous on
A real smart approach to begin with ! Smart people are the local backbone of the collective network for adjustment of behaviour when 3 meters is your highest point , not for international standards in every point, of course. Just as for developing a growing tourism, developing a better agriculture and fishing or having sustainable power available and comunications to work with ,to move from poverty as a matter of fact. A little smart infrastrucure and even healthcare may be delivered by a ship in a network of health. Mobility and adaptation that`s how we got here and in touch with one another, not importing rigidity of models... why on earth would we export them as a whole ?! local entrepreneurs and transparent rules with timing result analysis and monitoring to adjust can deliver so much more, so quickly.

Thanks for your comments - and you're right to point out the key importance of basic infrastructure and services in enabling many other aspects of development.

There is at least on financial management system designed for government that can scale from very small, core functions, usable in developing countries to wealthy countries. The difficulty is when financial software was originally designed for these wealthy countries - or worse - for the private sector. Here's the thing: countries like Kiribati can afford to leapfrog more advanced countries because there may not be the legacy of old information systems. Good practices can be activated as capacity increases and based on the country context. We've seen post-conflict and small countries succeed with this approach.

Submitted by Anonymous on
I am 50% Kiribati and last year Christmas and NY I went and visited my mums family for the first time. At first I was scared, knowing that Kiribati was extremely small with hardly any resources, only enough for living. But when I got there, I loved it so much, to see everybody so happy and smiling even though they are less privelidged. And then as I met more and more of my family I began to love it even more, then I came back to my home country and decided to do a bridging course to get into nursing, because the health system there were obviously too small. I want to be apart of the development of this small island, one thing that saddened me was the rubbish on the shores and no toilets. Well, none in the typical home, they use the beach. Small things like this will make a difference. I look forward to reading your future blogs and seeing what you will be doing to help my country :)

Add new comment