Staying the Course in Mongolia: 14 years institutionalizing community participation

But in some cases, it does go (more or less) accordingly to plan despite bumps in the road along the way. One such example is the Sustainable Livelihoods Program series in Mongolia, which on September 17, 2015 launched its third and final phase.
Back in 2002, after a series of particularly harsh winters that killed one-third of the livestock in Mongolia and added even more strain to an already impoverished rural population, the World Bank decided to support a new approach to sustainable livelihoods. At that time, the country had little history of community participation in local development planning, and few rural finance options.

This vision and core principles were translated into the design of the three-part Sustainable Livelihoods Series, which included piloting, scaling-up and institutionalization phases.
The objective of SLPI [1] (2002-2007) was to achieve an effective approach to promoting improved, secure and sustainable livelihood strategies and to demonstrate and validate the pilot approach in selected areas. SLPII [2] (2008-2013) focused on enhancing livelihood security and sustainability by scaling up those institutional mechanisms and approaches piloted in SPLI. SLPIII [3], the third and final stage, envisioned an institutionalization of the approaches supported by SLPI and SLPII.

Overall, over 6,000 sub-projects were completed with over 90% community satisfaction. Through microfinance development funds, $42 million was lent to over 40,000 borrowers in the rural areas. As a result, 57% more households were able to make winter preparations and more than 36,000 herder families improved their pastoral risk management. Some of the results are captured in this video [5].
These are concrete and impressive results. But perhaps even more so is the degree to which the program’s principles have been institutionalized. The Integrated Budget Law was passed in 2011, putting into law many of the approaches demonstrated under SLP, such as the Local Development Fund, which puts more funds in the hands of local governments and gives communities a say on how those funds are spent. For a country with a strong history of central planning, this is a significant change in policy direction. The pastoral risk management approaches developed during the course of the program have been formally adopted by the land agency. And the Micro-Credit Development Fund is fully self-financing and operating independently.

Photo: Former SLP task team leaders (Andrew Goodland, and Nathan Belete also Practice Manager) and current TTL (Helene Carlsson Rex) with Country Manager (Jim Anderson) at the September 17th, 2015, project launch in Ulaanbaatar.
- Tags:
- Sustainable Development [7]
- community participation [8]
- Poverty [9]
- Agriculture and Rural Development [10]
- East Asia and Pacific [11]
- Mongolia [12]
- community-driven development [13]