Syndicate content

Weighing the benefits of senior high school in the Philippines

Harry A. Patrinos's picture
Students walk by a school offering senior high school levels. Photo Credit: Samer Al-Samarrai /World Bank
In June 2016, approximately 1.5 million children across the Philippines will walk through school gates for the first time to attend senior high school. The Department of Education has been gearing up for this moment for several years. The basic education curriculum, from kindergarten to senior high – grades 11 and 12 – has been thoroughly reviewed and efforts are in full swing to ensure that the 60,000 additional teachers and classrooms are in place when schools open in the new school year.

The Philippines has embarked on this ambitious reform to align its education system with most other systems around the world and to raise national competitiveness. The government sees a K-12 system as vital for ensuring that all Filipinos are equipped with the basic skills required to play a full and productive role in society. It is also being driven by concerns that overseas workers will lose out to migrant workers from other countries because of their shorter basic education cycle. This is especially relevant given that about 18 percent of the average Filipino family’s income originates from overseas remittances.

However, despite widespread support for the reforms, critics argue that the benefits, particularly for poor families, are not comparable to the costs associated with keeping their children in school for an extra two years. An article last October in the International New York Times raised concerns about the overall direction of the K-12 reform and particularly highlighted that many families saw ‘two more years of schooling as a costly burden, not a benefit’.

What do we know about the impact of reforms of this kind?

Similar reforms aimed at extending access to schooling have frequently resulted in significant gains for all. In the Philippines itself, reforms in the early 1980s that increased access, by eliminating tuition fees in high school and building new schools, were associated with significant returns. Research has found that returns resulting from increases in educational attainment are around 15 percent a year compared to an average annual return of only  eight percent a year.

Studies from other countries also point to significant gains from reforms of this kind. In the United Kingdom, a change in the minimum school leaving age that required children to stay in school for an extra year resulted in large returns, a finding that echoed earlier findings from Canada and the United States. Similar returns were experienced by beneficiaries of the extension of compulsory schooling in Venezuela in the 1980s. 

Back of the envelope calculations of the returns from an additional two years of secondary schooling in the Philippines also point to significant gains from access to senior high school. Estimates from the 2013 labor force survey show that workers with incomplete tertiary education enjoyed an additional annual return of about 17 percent compared to over and above junior secondary school completers.

Assuming similar returns for senior high school suggests big benefits for the new program even after accounting for the foregone earnings of the extra time spent in school. While all investments have a degree of risk attached to them (e.g. warning: stocks can go up, as well as down) these kinds of returns compare favorably with other investment opportunities. But even these high returns may be out of reach for some poor families without the support of programs like the conditional cash transfer program of the Department of Social Welfare and Development, which provides families with a monthly stipend to attend school.

Only time and effort to monitor the program will tell if the potential benefits of the reform will materialize. The Department of Education is already planning to once again participate in international assessments. These assessments will provide part of the answer to whether reforms have improved competitiveness.  But this is only the tip of the iceberg.

Much more detailed evaluation work could be done to provide a detailed picture of the strengths and weaknesses of implementation. For example, longitudinal studies tracing a cohort of students and their schools would provide important insights into how the program is running. Work of this kind could improve the chances of realizing the enormous benefits that a reform of this kind could have for future generations.  
 
Find out more about the World Bank Group’s work on education on Twitter and Flipboard.
 
 

Comments

Submitted by Beth King on

The changing needs of labor markets and the greater role of technology in production are putting more pressure on education systems to produce better-trained graduates. Students graduating from high school at 16 or younger, with two fewer years of schooling than their counterparts in other countries, are disadvantaged when they enter university or the job market. The current reform goes in the right direction and is way overdue.

Manny Jimenez and I recently compared the economic growth prospects across countries in Asia and we conclude that "[t]he role of human capital in the growth narrative among the successful economies in East Asia and the Pacific — especially the so-called East Asian “Tigers” — is well-known and is a formula that other countries have tried to emulate" (http://www.eastasiaforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/PAFTAD-37-Emmanuel-Jimenez-and-Elizabeth-King.pdf). Although more years of schooling does not guarantee higher skills (since schools don't often succeed in teaching students what they are expected to learn), we can hope that the increased instructional time promised by this K-12 reform will work towards that. Several years ago, I invited several high-level administrators of universities in the Philippines to a meeting and they unanimously bemoaned the poor preparation of high school graduates who were entering college. Because of this poor preparation, the first year of university is spent largely in equipping those students with the writing, communication and math skills required to do the work. In other words, the first year of university serves mainly as a remedial program, so effectively short-changing the time for education at the tertiary level. For those students who drop out before college, a high school diploma doesn't mean very much in many jobs; hence, families and high school graduates feel the pressure to muster personal resources to attend college.

The Philippines must stand firmly behind this major reform it has begun. It cannot hope to compete with its neighboring economies in the future unless the duration of schooling of its students increases. It also cannot hope to compete in the future unless the quality of that schooling improves--but that is another discussion.

Dear Beth,

Many thanks for the comments and the link to your paper. Indeed, implemented in the right way, and coupled with the right policies in other areas (e.g. trade, labor markets etc.),  the ongoing reforms have the potential to raise long term economic growth rates. But as you say, increasing the number of years of schooling also need to translate into better learning outcomes. And the groundwork for better learning also has to be put in place long before children reach senior high. The K-12 reforms have other components that try and put these foundations in place. For example, kindergarten was recently made compulsory and enrolment rates have soared. And the introduction of multilingual mother tongue education in the early grades of elementary holds out the prospect of better early grade learning outcomes. However, as we say in the original blog, it is vital that such an ambitious reform program is monitored and adjusted where necessary to ensure it delivers the improvements it is aiming for.

Submitted by Dr Reuben. Nguyo on

Great initiatives to addresses inequalities in education especially in developing countries. Curriculum for developing countries should address urgent needso facing the society

Dear Dr Nguyo,

Thanks for the comments. Reforms to the curriculum have also been introduced across K-12 to improve learning outcomes and in senior high the introduction of different tracks (e.g. academic, technical and vocational) was designed to ensure that education remained relevant to all youth. These changes have only recently been

Add new comment