The World Bank - Working for a world free of poverty

A blog about Governance and Development for All

About us

Welcome

This is the World Bank's blog on governance and anti-corruption. It aims at providing a space for debate and knowledge sharing on this critical field of development. | Learn more...

January 2009

Bailout a la Swedish? Not without transparency and tough measures

Submitted by Alfredo on Wed, 2009-01-28 20:56

With a new administration in the White House, different approaches to address the persistent financial crisis are on the table, once more.  Over the last week there's been some talking about the creation of an "aggregator bank" -also called 'bad' bank- that will buy troubled assets with part of the remaining bailout funds (TARP), aiming to take toxicity off financial institutions' balance sheets. 

An aggregator bank that eats all of the junk in the financial sector is expected to finally unfroze credit markets, and gives new life to the idea of a bailout a la Swedish.  However, the Nordic country's experience draws some specific governance lessons that go beyond separating good and bad assets, and that are applicable regardless of the technicalities, features and context that make both cases different.

 

From self regulation to government regulation: Mary Shapiro move to the SEC as a metaphor?

Submitted by Kaufmann on Tue, 2009-01-27 12:59

Mary Shapiro, unquestionably a highly qualified choice, was confirmed by the US Senate and is expected to be sworn in the next days as the new chairman of the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC).  She would literally be moving from a chief self-regulator to a chief government regulator.  Her previous position was as CEO of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, FINRA, the largest independent and non-governmental regulator for securities firms in the US.  In her Senate hearings, Shapiro indicated that she would give priority to the regulatory problem in the country and that she will reinvigorate the SEC enforcement divisions.  But according to a Wall Street Journal article, Shapiro showed a light regulatory touch at FINRA.

 

Satyam vs. Siemens Corruption: The Difference is in Ponzinomics

Submitted by Kaufmann on Wed, 2009-01-14 19:50

The financial crisis exposes emperors with no clothes.  Witness Madoff.  But naked truths are not only emerging for those dealings with obscure financial instruments.  Dramatic exposure in the corporate business sector is also taking place. 

Last month we discussed the corruption scandal surrounding Siemens, the multinational giant, which has agreed to pay billions in fines and fees.  With the holiday came a short truce.  New Year had not even taken place and we are hit by the enormity of the Satyam’s corporate fraud, labelled as India's Enron.

Bribery and fraud by business corporations is not new, of course.  And in fact the Siemens bribery case is a longstanding one, preceding the financial crisis.  Corporate fraud and corruption are not unique to developing or to industrialized countries, obviously.  They can take place anywhere.  They do.

The magnitude and timing proximity between the Siemens and Satyam corporate scandals may tempt some to rush and generalize, lumping such corporate scandals together as belonging to the same kilt.  That would be unfortunate.  There is a fundamental difference between those two cases.  It relates to “Ponzinomics.”  While Satyam shows clear features of a Ponzi scheme, the Siemens case doesn’t.  This difference matters.