With a new administration in the White House, different approaches to address the persistent financial crisis are on the table, once more. Over the last week there's been some talking about the creation of an "aggregator bank" -also called 'bad' bank- that will buy troubled assets with part of the remaining bailout funds (TARP), aiming to take toxicity off financial institutions' balance sheets.
An aggregator bank that eats all of the junk in the financial sector is expected to finally unfroze credit markets, and gives new life to the idea of a bailout a la Swedish. However, the Nordic country's experience draws some specific governance lessons that go beyond separating good and bad assets, and that are applicable regardless of the technicalities, features and context that make both cases different.