The World Bank - Working for a world free of poverty

A blog about Governance and Development for All

About us

Welcome

This is the World Bank's blog on governance and anti-corruption. It aims at providing a space for debate and knowledge sharing on this critical field of development. | Learn more...

Global Corruption Barometer 2009: people's experience and perception about corruption

Transparency International released its 2009 Global Corruption Barometer.   As opposed to TI's expert opinion survey -the Corruption Perception Index-, the Barometer is a public opinion survey that captures perceptions and experiences of corruption of more than 73,000 people in 69 countries.

Some of the corruption issues addressed by the survey are: perception of corruption in the private sector, petty bribery in general and in different services, perception of most corruption institutions/sectors, corruption denunciation and use of complaint mechanisms, and perception of governments' effectiveness in the fight against corruption.

Among the main results in this year's survey are:

  • Political parties and civil servants were considered to be the single most corrupt institutions -29 percent and 26 percent, respectively.
  • The private sector was considered the single most corrupt institution mainly in developed countries -Canada, Denmark, Hong Kong, Iceland, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Singapore, Spain and Switzerland.
  • Political parties were the other single most corrupt institution considered in developed countries -Austria, Finland, Greece, Israel, Italy, South Korea and the UK.
  • The Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region recorded the largest number of people who report paying a bribe over the last year -40 percent of total respondents.
  • All countries most affected by bribery (more than 50 percent of respondents reporting bribe payments- are in Africa -Cameroon, Liberia, Sierra Leone and Uganda.
  • The police is the institution most likely to be bribed -24 percent of respondents reported paying bribes in the past year.
  • The judiciary was the institution that registered the largest increase of corruption reported over the last years -14 percent of respondents in 2009 vs. 8 percent in 2006.
  • Poorer households paid significantly more bribes to get some services -police, judiciary, land services and education.
  • The main reason for not complaining about corrupt was that people thought it would have not helped at all -51 percent of respondents.
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is the region with the highest percentage of people who felt their governments' anti-corruption efforts were effective -64 percent of respondents.
  • Comparing the same group of countries, public's perception about the private sector shaping policies and regulation through bribes is significantly larger than the perception of senior business executives -54 percent of respondents reported in the Barometer vs. 32 percent of respondent reported in the Bribe Payers Index.

For more details, you can find the report here.

Comments

Reply to "Este comentario"

Jorge,

Thanks so much for your comment. I read Manuel Jauregui's article -and others- and disagree with the interpretation of the Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) results.

While the scores capture the attention of media and journalists, you also have to consider the margins of error when making a comparison with other countries. Also you cannot generalize about the overall governance performance of a country by fousing only on the results of one of the six indicators. Even more, these indicators that provide a governance picture at the macro level have to be complemented with evidence from other governance indicators or experiences that are more specific, as you mention with the example of Blundo's book.

I'll be glad to have a more detailed exchange about the state of governance in Mexico. In the meantime, you can find the paper published by Dani Kaufmann, Aart Kray and Massimo Mastruzzi at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1424591 Also, you can go to the website of the WGI to get more information http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/sc_country.asp

Saludos, y me prondre en contacto contigo pronto.

Alfredo: Este comentario

Alfredo:

Este comentario incluye una pregunta -sería mejor llamarla "petición"- y una invitación. Aprovecho que somos connacionales para redactar en castellano. Al resto de los lectores, por ello, una disculpa.

Primero la pregunta. El jueves 1 de julio, Manuel Jáuregi, columnista del diario Reforma, publicó una opinión más o menos desesperanzadora. Según algunas mediciones del Banco Mundial (aunque no cita la fuente), el Congo (RDC) es más gobernable que México. Jáuregi reacciona a esta conclusión: denuncia a nuestros políticos por haber permitido que el país se sumiera en este caos.

Al respecto, me interesan dos cosas. Jáuregi representa, en primera instancia, un rasgo de cómo muchos mexicanos perciben lo político en general, y la corrupción en particular. Todo político es, por definición, corrupto; los que no, se entienden más bien como excepciones a la regla. Jáuregi lee con esta mirada las mediciones del Banco Mundial. Reproduce lo que podríamos llamar "una cierta idea de la corrupción en México".

Creería yo que vale la pena ligar, aún no sé cómo, esta idea a las prácticas que describe el barómetro de tu nota. Pienso en uno de los más reconocidos economistas de tu institución: Castoriadis. Lo imaginario es quizá más central para nuestra experiencia de la realidad que eso otro, aquello que ahora podríamos llamar, "sólo realidad". En fin.

En segundo término, la columan de Jáuregi me interesa -pasando ahora a sus fuentes- por el citado documento del BM. Y he aquí la pregunta: tienes idea de cuál es el documento del que habla? -con sutileza, espero, paso a la petición- si sabes cuál es, podrías decirme dónde localizarlo?

Finalmente, cierro este comentario con la invitación anunciada. Quiero insistir en lo sugerido arriba: hace falta ligar las prácticas de corrupción con la forma de imaginar el evento. Giorgio Blundo, antropólogo de la EHESS campus Marsella, ha publicado un volumen, metodológicamente impecable, que mitiga esta inquietud. Quizá conozcas el libro y me gustaría establecer un diálogo contigo en torno a él. Se titula, Everyday forms of corruption and the State. El estudio es específicamente africano, te gustará.

Espero leer pronto tu respuesta.

Saludos cordiales,
JC

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters (without spaces) shown in the image.