Syndicate content

How is the conditional cash transfers program changing the politics of service delivery in Philippines?

Motoky Hayakawa's picture
Photo: Kenneth Pornillos / World Bank

Vote buying has shaped much of Philippine politics throughout history. For many politicians, distributing private goods and cultivating patronage to individual supporters is one of the most effective electoral strategies.

While the line between public and private is traditionally blurry, people who are used to this relationship with those who hold positions in government tend to measure politicians’ performance in terms of how much they provide private goods as opposed to broad public goods.
 
But though it may have been prevalent, vote buying has been a serious constraint in the country. Research has shown that practices such as vote buying and political dynasties undermine public service delivery and poverty reduction. How can these practices, which are so deeply embedded in Filipinos’ political way of life, begin to change?

A program like the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (Pantawid Pamilya or 4Ps), a conditional cash transfer (CCT) program, could be one way to begin a change.

As one of the Philippine government’s flagship programs in the fight against poverty, the program currently provides financial grants to 4.6 million poor households across the country that have children ages 0-18 years old, on the condition that the children regularly go to school and get health check-ups.
 
There is strong empirical evidence that the program is making a positive impact on the day-to-day lives of millions of poor people in the country. A recent World Bank report also highlighted Pantawid Pamilya as one of the largest and best-implemented conditional cash transfer programs in the world.
 
However, here we would like to draw the attention not to “what” is being delivered, but “how” it is delivered. The key principles of good governance such as transparency, openness, accountability and participation are all imbedded in the design and implementation of Pantawid Pamilya. We underscore this in the new briefing note “Why Does the Conditional Cash Transfer Program Matter in the Philippines?”
 
Unlike the old ways, the 4Ps beneficiaries are selected using a national household targeting system for poverty reduction – Listahanan -- which relies on objective and verifiable criteria, including household income, to identify poor families. Moreover, the poverty status is validated by the community.

The targeting system works very well. In 2013, 65 percent of the CCT beneficiaries were poor with 82 percent coming from the bottom 40 percent of the population. According to the World Bank report “The State of Social Safety Nets 2015”, these results put Pantawid Pamilya among the best targeted CCT programs in the world.
 
Because objective criteria are used to identify poor families, the lists of the poor are now open for verification by members of the community before households are officially enrolled in the program and given the cash grants. Furthermore, along with Listahanan, a transparent and well-functioning grievance redress system helps people realize that access to government services is no longer contingent upon their political support.
 
One beneficiary expressed it like this: “I am getting this grant because my name is in the computer”.

Not because she voted for the mayor. Even better, the conditions—her children attending school and the whole family going to the health facility—now make her understand that it is her right to demand that these services get delivered to citizens and that the government at all levels is responsible and accountable for that delivery.
 
The way the CCT program is delivered to its beneficiaries marks a significant departure from the long-established vote buying and patronage politics of service delivery in the Philippines. Also, it holds potential for transforming governance in the country.

​We believe that one of the most profound transformations in government-citizen relations begins when citizens start demanding that the government deliver services as its obligation and duty, not as a personal favor, and that the government be held accountable for that delivery.

Comments

Submitted by Alexander A. Ali on

Based on our personal experience in the province of Lanao del Norte. The 4P's is always working in favor of the incumbent politicians. While the mechanism on the selection process is generally fair. The mechanics of its implementation is susceptible to biases and influences of those who are in power. The clearances or signatures in the DepEd and the Rural Health Units are being manipulated by the LGU's. Some beneficiaries are being unreasonably burden if they are identified to the local opposition. In the case of the DepEd or an elementary school in a rural area, the allocation for their maintenance and other operating Expeses (MOOE) is dependent on the number of their enrollees, it happens that the school principals are conniving with the 4P's fictitious beneficiaries to increase their school population by enlisting ghost students. Education for the 4P's beneficiaries needs to be improved and I recommend that they should be involve during election through conducting candidates forum which should be facilitated by the COMELEC. In this way, they will be informed of their rights as a voter and to be empowered to elect their rightful leaders.

Add new comment