The World Bank - Working for a world free of poverty

Views menu

Syndicate content

Why Dwell Time Matters

The state-owned operator of Indonesia’s Tanjung Priok Port is taking major steps to decrease congestion at the country’s main gateway. The company, Pelindo II, recently announced it will increase storage fees at the port to discourage shippers from leaving containers there for long periods of time. It has also said it will install a new information technology system to better monitor and direct traffic at the port.

The two initiatives are an effort to boost the performance of a port that handles two-thirds of Indonesia’s international trade. The container traffic at Tanjung Priok has grown at a rate of about 20 percent the last two years and is expected to double by 2015. But containers arriving at the port spend an average of 6 days to obtain clearance and get removed, one of the highest “dwell time” rates in the region and up from 4.9 days in 2010.

Economists and government officials are trying to bring down this number. As a statistic, dwell time is a vital measure of a country’s ease of trade. When dwell time is high,

Should We Still Worry About Food Prices?

Food prices are finally coming down after a year of spikes and high volatility. But we must remain vigilant. Prices of certain foods remain very high, and millions of people around the world are still at risk of suffering from malnutrition and hunger.

Let’s get to the numbers first. According to the World Bank’s latest Food Price Watch quarterly report released this week, global food prices declined 8 percent between September and December of 2011 due to increasing supplies and continuing uncertainty about the global economy. So in December 2011, the World Bank Food Price Index closed 7 percent below the December 2010 levels, and 14 percent lower than its February peak. Yet, the 2011 index average is 24 percent higher than the year before, and domestic prices of key staples remain dangerously high in many countries.

Take the case of maize. In Mexico, for instance, maize was up 106 percent from December 2010 to December 2011, making tortillas more expensive. The price of wheat in Belarus went up 88 percent, and sorghum increased 57 percent in Burkina Faso. No matter where you look, someone somewhere is paying more money to put food on the table, whether it is Mexican quesadillas or Burkinabe “to” (porridge).

It’s true that high food prices are not bad for everybody. While the poor in urban areas and rural net consumers of food are usually threatened the most, farm producers tend to benefit. Yet when there is so much price volatility--as we experienced last year--uncertainty very often gets in the way of reaping any gains.

Rise of non-tariff protectionism amid global uncertainty

A troubling phenomenon is occurring in large, emerging economies: the gates are closing. Governments, skittish about global economic trends, are introducing new policies to limit imports and exports. The aim is to protect domestic industry in tough times, but the tools governments are using threaten to make their economic problems worse.

A December World Bank analysis documents a trend of creeping protectionism in countries such as Argentina, Brazil and Indonesia – all countries with burgeoning industry. Instead of tariffs, other more indirect policies are being used to hinder free commerce between countries. The Bank analysis, based on World Trade Organization (WTO) monitoring reports and data from the Global Trade Alert, a network of think tanks around the globe, found that the number of non-tariff measures (NTMs) –including quotas, import licensing requirements and discriminatory government procurement rules –showed an increasing trend in the first two years post-2008, and rose sharply in 2011. India, China, Indonesia, Argentina, Russia, and Brazil together accounted for almost half of all the new NTMs imposed by countries world-wide.

The measures take various forms. In December, amid a political shake-up, Indonesia announced its intention to

Political Economy in a Bad Economy

As the world struggles to recover from the financial crisis, developing and developed countries alike depend on effective finance ministries and their associated central finance agencies (CFAs) to help deliver good fiscal outcomes. Although ministries of finance usually assume the most prominent role at the country level, supporting CFAs can assume responsibility for a number of essential duties, including macroeconomic forecasting, tax policy, budget preparation, and debt management—just to name few. Given the importance of these functions in times of crisis, enhancing the capability of these agencies in developing countries is more urgent now than ever.

According to the World Bank’s recently released Global Economic Prospects report, Euro Area debt problems and weakening growth in several big emerging economies are dimming global growth prospects, and developing countries should prepare for further downside risks. Moreover, the report notes that developing countries have less fiscal and monetary space for remedial measures than they did in 2008/09, and their ability to respond may be constrained if international finance dries up and global conditions deteriorate sharply.

Against this downgraded growth forecast, developing countries need to do everything they can to strengthen the capabilities of their CFAs. To do so, it is highly important to take a country’s political economy factors into account—that is, to analyze the interrelations of political and economic institutions and processes that influence national decision making.

Why it’s important to “Think Equal” when it comes to trade facilitation

Gender equality can not only spur country competitiveness, but taking this aspect into account in trade related interventions can help obtain better outcomes. Often times, however, it can be difficult for practitioners to understand how to apply gender into their trade work.

There is indeed a gap between the literature and the type of trade interventions that are becoming increasingly important in the World Bank portfolio. The majority of the literature has focused on the relationship between gender equality as outcome and trade liberalization policies (measured usually by tariffs or openness to trade). While this type of liberalization and the exposure to the global environment is still a key area for support, there is only