Watch Annual Meetings development events from Oct 10-13. Comment and engage with experts. Calendar of Events


Syndicate content

Add new comment

Submitted by Simon H. Heß on

Hi Jacobus,

What the right approach is depends very much on your original randomization, about which you did not provide all details. I can however give you some general hints which might help you compute what you want.

(1) if the two treatments (and control) are mutually exclusive, i.e. they can be described by a single treatment variable taking on the values 0, 1, or 2, you might be able to run:

ritest treat (_b[1.treat]-_b[2.treat]), cluster(cid) strata(sid): reg y x i.treatment

to obtain what you are looking for.

(2) If your treatments are overlapping, it is only slightly more complex to let the re-randomization follow the original procedure. For this you can use the samplingprogram()-option. A user-defined rerandomization program is allowed to alter more than just a single treatment-indicator variable and can thus rerandomize your data in the way you want. You can than still specify "(_b[1.treat]-_b[2.treat])" as the statistic of interest. You can always double-check what ritest does using the saveresampling()-option.

Please let me know if I misunderstood your question or if you have any further questions.