“Don’t waste your time in local breeding programs if someone else can improve the seed for you. We are a small country and cannot afford to reinvent the wheel”. This was the pragmatic advice of a Bhutanese agro-scientist visiting Bolivia a few years ago. His statement might be true, especially in resource-limited countries. However, I strongly believe that implementing agricultural innovations requires bridging the global with the local in a two-way partnership, with strong capabilities in the field. Here's a good example.
From the moment the earthquake happened, I was anxious to go to the coastal areas that were most affected. Possibly because of my past life working for a relief agency, where emergencies were an immediate call to action to help those who were, and are, facing so much loss – loss of family and friends, of homes, of livelihoods, of a sense of peace and security. But also a sense of uncertainty to be faced with such loss –to look beyond the tragedy to find the hope. While at the same time, managing the risks for my colleagues and myself of possibly facing another strong replica that might leave us among the disaster.
This blog was previously published in The World Post.
Talk about ‘growth’ in Latin America has become less upbeat today than a few years ago. That’s no surprise. For over a decade, average growth meant at least double the economic activity that we are seeing today.
The global commodities boom of the past decade has had an undeniable impact on Latin America and the Caribbean. Rich in minerals, forest and water, the region’s golden decade was boosted significantly by income from the extractives industry, especially oil, iron and copper.
Read parts 1 & 2
There’s good evidence that a country’s level of financial development affects the impact of volatility on economic growth, particularly so in less developed countries, as the charts below demonstrate