The World Bank - Working for a world free of poverty

Views menu

Reply to comment

Matt is probably right that

Matt is probably right that if migrants lose their job, they might be more willing (compared to natives) to take up "worse" jobs--even ones that pay less or require them to move across state lines or work in a different sector--in order to be able to stay on in the US. While new migration flows have slowed, those who are already in the host countries are most likely staying put (see the BBC report on Migration and the Global Recession http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8238527.stm and our Migration and Development brief http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPROSPECTS/Resources/334934-1110315015165/Migration&DevelopmentBrief10.pdf).

There are several reasons why migrants would try to stay on: first, tighter border controls and immigration enforcement have made it harder for migrants to come back to the US if they leave (see http://www.forbes.com/2009/07/17/mexico-illegal-immigration-business-oxford.html). Second, since the current crisis is global, the job situation in the home countries is likely to be equally bad or in some cases worse. Third, for most migrants, moving from a developing to a developed country represents a huge income gain even after controlling for education, skills etc. In a recent paper, Pritchett, Clemens and Montenegro (http://www.cgdev.org/content/publications/detail/16352) estimate that the gains for a moderately skilled worker moving to the US from a developing country is about $10,000 in purchasing power-adjusted terms, more than double the average income of a typical developing country. Since going back would reverse some of these income gains, it makes sense for migrants to try to stay on.

Migrants are also typically flexible and geographically mobile and willing to move across sectors to find jobs. As you can see from the second graph, migrant employment in hotels and restaurants and wholesale and retail trade has been relatively more stable, and even increased somewhat, likely because some migrants in sectors such as construction that have been the most severely affected have moved to services sectors.

In the short run, perhaps the most important factor for the turnaround is the emerging bottoming out of the decline in construction activity in the US. New housing started grew by 1.5 percent in August, a nine-month high (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/constructionandproperty/6203493/US-shows-signs-of-recovery-as-housing-market-perks-up.html). Since this sector employs many migrants, this means that overall migrant employment would rise.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <br> <p>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.