Why has growth been more successful in reducing poverty in some countries than in others? How can poor women and men best participate in, contribute to and benefit from growth? What can donors do to promote a pattern of growth that better connects poor people to the growth process and to help deal with the risks, vulnerabilities and market failures which hold back their participation?
ADR Pakistan - see notes from Hanoi
case classification critical for pulling cases out of courts
CEDR - THE mediation folks, especially for Europe
El Salvador recently became the 11th country to sign a compact with the US Millennium Challenge Corporation. Marcela Sanchez at the Washington Post considers whether the $461 million agreement will reduce Salvadoran dependency on an annual diet of $2.8 billion in remittances. From her article over the weekend:
Muhammad Yunus gave his Nobel Lecture in Oslo yesterday.
We get what we want, or what we don't refuse. We accept the fact that we will always have poor people around us, and that poverty is part of human destiny. This is precisely why we continue to have poor people around us. If we firmly believe that poverty is unacceptable to us, and that it should not belong to a civilized society, we would have built appropriate institutions and policies to create a poverty-free world.
Are women as globalized as men? Daniel Altman provoked some gender-balanced debate by noting that 95% of the comments on his Managing Globalization blog are from men. The same is true on the PSD blog. Commenters write that women sometimes post as men in hopes of being taken more seriously. They also quibble about his implied definition of globalization. Those points aside, Dan raises an interesting question. A few of my unscientific reflections on "women's globalization" after the jump...