Syndicate content

A development lottery

Malawi is the latest country to set up a national sweepstake, aiming to use some of the proceeds to fund development projects, but do state lotteries really work?

That’s what the BBC is asking you. Doesn’t make sense to me.

I don’t know much about this, but this sounds like a terrible idea because:

  1. the use of lottery proceeds to improve public education systems in the US has been mixed - at best,
  2. tremendous governance concerns,
  3. significant transaction costs, and
  4. the poorest will inevitably be the players (losers) of this lottery which is supposedly meant to subsidize the essential services they are not receiving. A rural farmer in Malawi has much better use for a dollar than spending it on a lottery ticket.

Would make more sense to have a RED lottery in Europe earmarked to development projects in Malawi – though even the economics of that is questionable.

Comments

Submitted by Christopher on
This reminds me of another case of altruism v. lottery...sort of. There's a proposition being proposed by an Arizona man to award $1 Million to one lucky voter in Arizona state elections. Once every 4 years, anyone who votes would be eligible for the $ 1 Million prize, which would be generated from the existing unclaimed lottery winnings in the state. The goal, clearly, is to spur voter turnout in the state. Google:"Arizona lottery voting"

Add new comment