Syndicate content

E-Money – Mobile Money – Mobile Banking – What’s the Difference?

When I speak at conferences or with people interested in the use of mobile phones for financial service delivery, I am often asked what is the difference between e-money, mobile money, mobile banking, and a range of other terms that are often used wily-nily in reference to this emerging business opportunity.  It is a good question.  People are confused.  And rightfully so.  There are no universally accepted definitions.  While this lack of uniformity may not be important much of the time, it does become critical at the regulatory level as well as when potential players are trying to have a meaningful conversation with each other. 

In an attempt to create some clarity around terminology, I researched documents from thought leaders in the e-money and branchless banking space to see if I could find any consistency among the terms used.  The definitions provided below are the result of that effort.  Writings from CGAP, the GSM Association, and the European Union were all leveraged heavily.   (You can find links to all terms that have been taken directly from source material.) 

Do you think having some consensus around terminology would be an important step for the industry?  How would you change the definitions that I have complied to make them more universally acceptable?  Your comments and thoughts are welcomed.

E-Money

Eu definition Simply put, electronic money or e-money is the electronic alternative to cash.  It is monetary value that is stored electronically on receipt of funds, and which is used for making payment transactions.  E-Money can be held on cards, devices, or on a server.  Examples include pre-paid cards, electronic purses, such as M-PESA in Kenya, or web-based services, such as PayPal.  As such, e-money can serve an umbrella term for a number of more specific electronic value products and services. 

The European Union (EU) has been involved in defining terms related to e-money since 2000, which is much longer than many other countries or regions.  The following definitions are included in the most recent proposed directive from the EU.

Electronic Money Institution.  A legal person that has been granted authorization to issue electronic money.

Hybrid Issuers.  Service providers who issue e-money as an accessory activity to their core business, ie mobile phone companies, public transport companies, etc. 

Mobile Financial Services

Mobile Financial Services or MFS is another broad term that refers to a range of financial services that can be offered across the mobile phone.  Three of the leading forms of MFS are mobile money transfer, mobile payments, and mobile banking.   
  
Mobile Money Transfer (MMT).  Services whereby customers use their mobile device to send and receive monetary value - or more simply put, to transfer money electronically from one person to another using a mobile phone.  Both domestic transfers as well as international, or cross-border, remittances are money transfer services.  

Mobile Payments.  While MMT addresses person-to-person money transfers, mobile payments refer to person-to-business payments that are made with a mobile phone.  Mobile proximity payments involve a mobile phone being used to make payments at a point-of-sale (POS) terminal.  In these cases, the mobile phone may communicate with the POS through contactless technologies, such as Near Field Communication (NCR).  Mobile remote payments involve using the phone as a mechanism to purchase mobile-related services, such as ring tones, or as an alternate payment channel for goods sold online.  Mobile bill payments tend to require interconnection with the bank account of the receiving business, and hence are considered part of mobile banking.  
  
Mobile Banking.  The connection between a mobile phone and a personnel or business bank account.  Mobile banking allows customers to use their mobile phone as another channel for their banking services, such as deposits, withdrawals, account transfer, bill payment, and balance inquiry.  Most mobile banking applications are additive in that they provide a new delivery channel to existing bank customers.  Transformative models integrate unbanked populations into the formal financial sector.  

Other Terms

Other terms that are often used in association with, or interchangeably with, e-money, mobile financial services include:
   
Electronic Wallet (eWallet).  Refers to the cash value that is stored on a card, phone, or other electronic device.  Pre-paid cards are one form of electronic wallet.  Electronic wallets can represent a fixed value.  In this case, once the value has been spent, the card can no longer be used.  Or wallets can be reloaded – to be used again and again.  The term wallet is used because the card or phone is considered a substitute for the cash normally carried in a person’s wallet.

Electronic Vouchers.  Refer to definition for electronic wallet. 

Mobile Money.  Refer to definition for mobile financial services. 

Mobile Wallet (mWallet).  An electronic wallet that is stored on a phone.  GSMA provides the following more specific definition: “mWallet is a data repository that houses consumer data sufficient to facilitate a financial transaction from a mobile handset, and the applicable intelligence to translate an instruction from a consumer through a mobile handset/bearer/application into a message that a financial institution can use to debit or credit bank accounts or payment instruments.”

Stored Value.  Refer to definition for electronic wallet.

Comments

The wave of Money banking and e-banking is spreading worldwide and in Africa as well. In Rwanda for instance due to the mushrooming of technology and IT some banks are now offering e-banking services. Mobile money services are under way - for instance the recently introduced Cell-Cash initiative (similar to M-pesa of Kenya) and e-bank have started.

Submitted by Ricardo Segovia on
We are an institution of 6000 clients in El Salvador, Central America and we are trying to reach 80,000 clients with POS technology or mobile money. It is possible? How and what can we do?

I am all for a uniform terminology. It certainly would make life a lot simpler and explanations a whole lot easier. However, I think that this is easier said than done. Part of the problem is that there are so many involved parties out there, each involved in or trying for a part of the action. Each of these is often using their own unique form of terminology. A simple example. A "mobile" in many parts of Africa is a "cellphone" or a "cell". Would this also give us "cellphone payments" or "cell payments"?

Add new comment