Thanks, Sina, for this discussion. From experience in Iraq and Afghanistan with both UN and INGOs it is clear that donors, by and large, are not willing to fund the exhaustive processes of regulatory and legal reform that underpin successful interventions in the media sector in post-conflict countries. These involve intense (and expensive) behind-the-scenes discussions with a wide range of stakeholders, from law and policy makers to media and law faculties to professional and citizen content producers and editors. The politics of coordination is complex, particularly in post-conflict environments where media is sectarian, partisan and a reflection of multiple national and international agendas. Results cannot be expected within a one or two year project cycle so there is a tendency to stick to old-school media training projects that are random, amateur and frankly self-serving (eg three day training in investigative journalism in a country where there are no freedom of information laws and an expectation that retaliation by those being investigated will be brutal and unpunished). Moreover as donor countries retrench economically and rethink their own transparency protocols, how likely is it that they will be willing to fund effective programmes that provide sustainable platforms for professional scrutiny by a local Fourth Estate on the impact and whereabouts of development aid?