Syndicate content

Defining Problems for Effective Coalition-Building

Sina Odugbemi's picture

Technical specialists like to name social problems using the language of their disciplines, and of whatever narrow policy community they belong to. What they often forget is that to secure broad support within the relevant political community how you define the problem that you are asking society to focus on and do something about matters. It matters a great deal. In fact, it can be the difference between getting the attention of legislators and broad publics or having your issue ignored.

For a live example consider the current efforts to implement health-care reform in the United States, something that presidents have been trying to do for about 50 years. Let's ask: What's wrong with America's health care system? What needs to be fixed? In other words what is the definition of the problem?

It turns out that there are two rival problem definitions in the public sphere right now. For some, access is the issue. They wail: how can you have a country as rich as this one and yet 50 million of its citizens have to access to health insurance? Is that not an outrage?

For others the issue is cost. They wail: America has the most expensive and wasteful health-care system on the planet, has little to show for it, health care costs ruin citizens, businesses and if they are not reined in will ruin the country itself.

If you listen to the tenor of the public debate on health care right now the prevailing problem definition is...it is all about cost. Congressional leaders and the president are trying to expand coverage significantly but the public case is all about reining in costs. That is largely because for most Americans the issue is cost, not universal coverage. The uninsured have little political clout. And if you want to build the broadest public support you use it-is-too-expensive-folks problem definition while still trying to improve coverage.

Smart politics. The entire world is watching as the reform battle progresses. The lessons for practitioners in international development is obvious yet usually ignored. The place to start building a coalition in support of reform initiatives is with the definition of the very problem you want that society to focus on and solve. Get that wrong and yours is likely to be a long, lonely.and  ultimately futile effort.

Photo Credit: Flickr user preciouskhyatt

Comments

Submitted by Dele Stephen Dina on
Corruption in the Nigeria Public sphere is predominantly driven by myopic and non altruistic desire to loot the treasury to satify personal and family whims and caprices to the detriment of collective survival and national prosperity without regard to punitive consequences of the docile legal framework .It is perpetrated with reckless impunity and with total disregard to due process of accounting procedures in the award of contract, bidding process , openess and transparency on the part of public servants chrged with the task of promoting good governance and fiscal discipline.Slaeze still pervades the system. Corrupt officials still find way to award contracts not on the strenght of the quality of presentation, competency , experience or relevant skills but to their croonies, political jobbers and relations. Accountability in the management of public fund suffers major draw back from inability of instituions and system operators to operationalize due process procedural work flows and compliance with standard accounting structures and techniques.Take for instance the case of a marketing department of a national Television Station where the marketing officer is the same person that receives cash for transaction, pay to the accountant and also be the one to determine the rate to be paid and the assesor of the air-time. There is apparent lack of check and balance in accounting procedures and systems. The clamour for cashless transaction and the introduction of the e-payment regime for contracts awarded still has its falliable errors as contractors and public servants still cut corners and make sure that only their patrons front for them and could acess these jobs. Personal agrandisement, egocentricism and visionless leadership has been the bane of Nigeria leadership which is responsible for wastages that has enticed youth to engage in militancy, broad day light robbery and economic sabotage that is on the increase. With enormous resources at its disposal, Nigeria could still be great if astuteness in leadership, accountability and people oriented programmes are the concern of our political leadership. Dele Stephen Dina, Executive Secretary, Media Network Against Corruption, Maitama, Abuja

Add new comment