Syndicate content

WANTED (a communication professional to save WikiLeaks and) JULIAN ASSANGE

Naniette Coleman's picture

Stockholm Criminal Court warrants, rumors that the US Senate will dub Julian Assange a “transnational threat”, conspiracy theories, and all other charges aside, the international transparency vessel that is WikiLeaks started sending out mayday signals the day that Daniel Domscheit-Berg (alias Daniel Schmitt) stepped down as spokesperson for WikiLeaks.   I believe that many  of the organizations problems began when founder and spokesperson became one-and-the-same.

Careful searching has unearthed zero articles where anyone challenges Assange’s intelligence, in fact just the opposite. In a recent New York Times article by John Burns and Ravi Somaiya “WikiLeaks Founder on the Run, Trailed by Notoriety”, it is noted that friends claim he has a near genius I.Q. and wouldn’t he need to in order “to establish WikiLeaks, redefining whistle-blowing by gathering secrets in bulk, storing them beyond the reach of governments and others determined to retrieve them, then releasing them instantly, and globally”? Birgitta Jónsdóttir a Member of Parliament in Iceland and WikiLeaks volunteer said in the same New York Times piece, “He’s very unique and extremely capable.”

What is on record, much to the displeasure of Assange, is that he exhibits “erratic and imperious behavior, and a nearly delusional grandeur unmatched by an awareness that the digital secrets he reveals can have a price in flesh and blood.” It appears at times as though Julian Assange is at war with the media. He has walked out of interviews with CNN and struck back at the NY Times, for what Burns calls “absolutely standard journalistic endeavor.” There are few arguments I have found that exemplify the importance of the work of my fellow communications professionals than the strikingly impetuous behavior, amateur spokesman skills and very public personal woes of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange. I am fairly convinced that if he had employed a professional spokesperson WikiLeaks might be in a better place.  Had Julian Assange had an advisor they might have suggested the following commonly considered approaches for judging the appropriateness of one’s communication:

· How would I feel if what I just said showed up on the front page of the newspaper?
· What is my gut feeling about what I am about to say?
· What would my role model do in this situation?
· What repercussions might I face legally for what I am about to say?
· What would my organizations code of conduct suggest in this situation?

Such advice would be rudimentary though, not taking into account timing, audience, context, verbal and non-verbal communication skills, and medium at the very least. A crisis communication specialist might suggest that the spokesperson should think through management decisions, know how management might falter given the emotion involved in a crisis, what types of mistakes they might make and consider ways that they might avoid costly mistakes, no small task when one is at the center of crisis. Finally, one has to be prepared to deal with the casualties of crisis. Again, simple as it sounds in approach many executives would probably gloss over this in a time of crisis while struggling to manage important details (as they see it) which may not translate well to their audiences either because of the way the message is crafted or because of the way in which it is delivered.

I recently spoke with a former senior US Department of Homeland Security Communications professional, who dealt with a communication crisis or two during her time. Although she vehemently disagrees with the work of Assange, saying, “there is a fine line between sharing information with the public and maintaining national security. That line exists for good reason to maintain the safety and security of our nation” she was quick to offer advice and quick to agree that not all executives make good spokespeople. “How someone handles himself in a crisis can make or break an organization. Crisis situations can often go from bad to worse if the leadership has not thought about crisis planning or engaged in basic training.” Personal opinion aside (N.B for Mr. Assange a good communication professional can put politics and personal opinion aside and still offer advice which lay people sometimes have difficulty with), she had the following to say about executives serving as spokespeople:

“It is of the utmost importance for organizations to have someone who can step back from the issue, a person who has a working relationship with the press and understands the importance of transparency --being open and honest while -- and can, at the same time, ensure that they are staying true to their organizations ethics and values. In many cases, the head of the organization focuses on management and executing the details of the day-to-day operations but a communications professional can step back. We know how to construct a message and communicate that to the public or to the media at the right time. We are trained to put information in a clear and concise way, ensuring that there is no confusion and very few managers and professionals are trained to do that and even fewer are trained to handle the unique set of issues that arise in a crisis situation.”

The lesson we learn from WikiLeaks in general and Mr. Assange in particular is you cannot assume that because you have information, a captive world audience, and the ability to speak that you are the best person to represent your organization. Every speaker comes with a certain amount of baggage; communications professionals wear that baggage differently, minimize it and make the message stand out. Right now, the only messages on WikiLeaks coming through loud and clear are about Julian Assange.

Photo courtesy of Flickr user jdlasica

Follow CommGAP on Twitter


Submitted by mayavision on
I beg to differ....significantly. Mr. Assange has without exception spoken thoughtfully, professionally, and with a great deal of wisdom behind his "near-genius" mind. He is part of a rising group of New Journalists, those who will follow their conscience and sense of decorum and not a script from higher up the totem pole. As anyone does, Mr. Assange has the Right to walk out on interviews that try to coerce him to belittle the BIG NEWS by harping on his personal life, which is an injustice to all the innocents who have suffered and died because of the moves taken on this Giant Chessboard of the Elite who are trying earnestly to Checkmate this planet.

Submitted by Homira Nassery on
This is an excellently written argument for why communication professionals are needed Naniette. Unfortunately from inside the Bank, it's difficult to see the critical role of our communications colleagues in this light as degrees of caution can sometimes obstruct open knowledge-sharing. I hope there is room to maneuver between the two worlds of strategic communications and knowledge management. Your writing is sharp, precise, and refreshingly clear. Keep up the good work. : )

Submitted by Anonymous on
This is a perfect example of the skillful demonization and personalization of Assange that has come to dominate this debate. The public discourse no longer focuses on the awful crimes that have taken place. We now waste our time luridly gossiping about Assange, his ego, and his putative sexual habits. We all seem to have forgotten the point; and the New York Times -- the touchstone of respectable "journalistic endeavour" -- has been in the vanguard of this cowardly sleight-of-hand.

With his "imperious behaviour" as described here, how many communications professionals would have been fired before Mr. Assange listened?

Submitted by Anonymous on
Mr. Assange is a hero. This phony freedom of speech is finally tested. I pray for him. Please everyone else support him.

Submitted by Gilbert Manda on
Regarding the diplomatic leaks, I wish Mr. Asange would balance that by leaking cables from other major nations. too. As far as I am concerned Mr. Assange is a super villain who is actually putting himself at the center of the story. That defeats the essence of untrammeled access to information. I think he overrates the significance of his leaks.

Add new comment