Global Monitoring Report 2010: What about Population Growth?
Measuring human progress is a messy, complicated effort. The Millennium Development Goals, or MDGs, are an effort to bring some standardization to that process, but the 8 globally agreed goals are viewed by some as a construct that handicaps the poorer countries into a race where they started a lap behind many other nations.
It's 10 years since the goals were agreed and 2010 has been designated the 'Year of the MDGs' by the UN and its partners. If all this helps feed hungry families, educate more kids and increase the distribution of antiretroviral drugs, I'm all for it. Good thing I feel that way, since I was working with the team that launched the Global Monitoring Report 2010: The MDGs After the Crisis on April 23.
Yet beyond the goals, targets and exhortations, as well as useful forecasts of extreme poverty rates in 2015, I wonder about the elephant in the room: population growth.
Seems to me that the inexorable crowding of the planet and the high birth rates in poor countries is under-studied and even ignored when in reality demographics will shape our future, more people will gobble our resources and our sheer numbers will play a huge role in whether we attain the MDGs. So, I urge readers to both check out the Global Monitoring Report, but also to check out the commentary by Robert Walker, Executive Vice President of the Population Institute on Huffington Post.
It may be politically incorrect, but unless we lift the taboo of talking about how to tackle population growth, I fear our laudable efforts at poverty reduction and advancing the human condition won't get too far.
More information:
- United Nations MDGs
- Global Monitoring Report
- Photos from Press Conference
- Press Release | Video | Slideshow (wmv)
Printer-friendly version
.jpg)
Comments
Unacknowledged science of human population dynamics......
Can you explain what looks like an overwhelming propensity not to more adequately use our prodigious collective intelligence of humanity when it comes to sharing an understanding of the profound implications both of human population dynamics and the human overpopulation of Earth? Are we not witnessing the most momentous failure of reason and common sense in our lifetime? Experts the world over appear to be conspicuously refusing to speak about "the whole" of what they know to be true with regard to the proverbial mother of human-driven threats to human wellbeing and environmental health. Almost everyone I respect seems to be unready, unwilling and unable to think critically, examine objectively and speak truthfully about this single topic. It is as if we are in a one-of-a-kind-situation when what could somehow be true is everywhere eschewed. In every other moment of human history I can recall, the guide post, the watchwords or the shibboleth of humanity regarding truth went something like this:
"Truth alone triumphs" ~ motto of India ~ "Satyameva jayate" (Sanskrit).
Natural philosophers and scientists have been speaking out about what they somehow knew to be true for hundreds of years. We appear to be in a time and of a generation in which the whole truth, based upon the best available science, is rejected. With regard to the primary cause of certain converging global threats to life as we know it and the integrity of our planetary home, elective mutism orders the days of our lives. On what grounds is the rejection of what is somehow real to be justified?
On this good evening I trust my note finds all of you well.
Post new comment