Attend Spring Meetings on development topics from Apr 18-23. Comment and engage with experts. Calendar of Events

World Bank Voices
Syndicate content

Timing Is Everything: Are We Heading to a New Global Food Price Crisis?

José Cuesta's picture

Read this post in Español, Français

Today the world seems to hold its breath again amidst the sudden hike in food prices caused by a historical drought in the US and lack of rain in Eastern Europe.[1] It is a thorny task to predict whether the very recent increases in food prices will unfold into magnitude of the crises seen in 2007-08 and again in 2010-2011: differences between now and then in the price of energy, a critical driver of food prices, give a reason for optimism; as does the hope that governments now better understand the painful consequences of some panic policies that have been put in place during previous episodes. On the other hand, months of volatility in global food prices, low food stocks and food security crisis alerts in parts of East and West Africa all paint a gloomy picture.

So, are we are heading toward another global food crisis?

The short answer is that we do not know. We cannot predict the unpredictable, such as future weather and other events that unleash energy prices, or domestic pressures that push governments to make hazardous decisions. But this is obvious. What is not so clear is whether we need new tools that are capable of warning countries of looming crises sufficiently early? Or, do we need more sustained attention from decision-makers regardless of the previous month’s food price status? Ideally, we need both.

We cannot predict the unpredictable but we need to – no, must – be better prepared for it. In part, the planning and preparation to face a crisis implies identifying the right warning signs and preparing the right responses at the right time.

How can we be better prepared to face food price crises?

One cannot prepare sufficiently early to prevent a future crisis (food related or other), but when it comes to an appropriate response to an unfolding crisis, these can also be tricky: late responses tend to be much less effective and more expensive, while a response that comes too early may be responding to a "false positive." Moreover, the varying types of crises – ranging from severe but transitory food insecurity caused by an unprecedented drought to predictable and cyclical food supply declines during lean seasons to recurrent emergencies related to structural issues such as conflict and migration, as seen in the Horn in Africa and the Sahel – can make it even more difficult to craft an adequate response.

Unfortunately, what precisely constitutes a global food crisis is an elusive notion. The international community does not have a clear definition of what a food crisis is, and agreeing on this concept or definition remains a challenge. The international community uses common concepts such as abnormal events and exceptional suffering, but lacks a unique conceptualization of the issue, a unique set of indictors and thresholds, and a consistent set of monitored countries.[2] Progress on these fronts would certainly help improve the preparedness of the international community to respond to unfolding crises.

A recent workshop at the World Bank co-sponsored by the Secure Nutrition Knowledge Platform aptly entitled “Calling a Spade a Spade”[3] examined the merits and limitations of three available early warning and monitoring frameworks that are used to identify unfolding food price crises. These included USAID’s FEWS NET, IFPRI’s Excessive Price Volatility Tool and the World Bank’s Global Food Crisis Monitoring Framework. The conclusion, however, remains that despite significant progress in crisis diagnosis, we are still far from agreeing on a set of consolidated and validated definitions and tools and, more notoriously, from an effective management of existing data. And this is not just an academic exercise: responding to a food price crisis is not “only” about calibrating the interventions – mixing prevention and mitigation, aligning key stakeholders’ interests, and mobilizing resources – but also about calibrating the right timing of responses.






Submitted by Aprameya Parida on
"Where there is a will ,there is a way".If we want,we can solve food crisis.In reality,we don't want.Otherwise,there won't be poor people to make fun of. Its politicians language to say that we can't prepare early to save a crisis.Whosoever prepares early for an examination or entrance test ,becomes topper,unlike politicians who gain victory by sheer luck ,reluctance of the populace to whom to vote,refrain by the intellectuals from entering into the fray etc. We can give importance to a few points to successfully challenge this menace. 1:We have limited resources.So we must check the population growth.In this regard,the help of developed nations is required to educate the illiterate population of the poor countries about family planning. 2:Developed nations must not waste a lot .Rather those food items can be saved for the hungry mouths. 3:We must divert our attention from modern day wars(Iraq war etc).Here we are using our resources for a bloody(loss) cause.This amount of money can be spent toward improving the status of millions.In my view ,such political crisis can be solved peacefully,much to the displeasure of Presidents & Prime Ministers.Moroever,our fanatic medias are wasting their pages for this nonsense thing.

Submitted by raushan on
hello parida,i agree with whatever you have mentioned but checking the population growth hasn't find a pragmatic way yet.So,thinking on the solution side the 3rd point of urs is very commendable.I hope something must be done and we can also make a difference some way by not wasting food whenevr we take,thats your 2nd point. thank you very much

Submitted by Sebastian on
It is my opinion that only via the unification of the human population are we to be able to evoke the sympathy required to support the lives of any tribes or communities that become affected by any coming food crises. Furthermore I am an advocate of the 'If They Starve, We Starve' policy, which is formatted upon the concept of compassion, and uses organization of rations across the expanse of the human population to achieve ultimate equilibrium. In other news, solar distillation in droughts, water towers during floods, and climate control might all be future alternatives to rising food prices.

Submitted by Seth on
While the economist will continue to debate about finer points of predicting and deciding when a food shortages become a food crisis (and may find it hard reach an agreement!), rest of us need to put our heads together to develop and introduce approaches/systems (technologies, management systems, policies, institutions etc.) to sustainably produce more with reduced inputs taking note of climate variability, improve post-harvest storage and go for more efficient marketing and distribution arrangements with full and transparent involvement of the private sector.

The rapid increase of price food. Made most of the people to thing on having their basic food. If it's continue this can damage many life and health. Government should take proper car of it and try to balance economic growth.

Submitted by Anonymous on
How can we have a food shortage when there is 1 billion obese people in the world? We have a distribution problem.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • Allowed HTML tags: <br> <p>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.