Syndicate content

What Policies Will Allow Russia Achieve Environmentally Sustainable Growth?

Adriana Jordanova Damianova's picture

The Russian Federation’s accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) is an event of exceptional importance.  On many levels, there are concerns that the environment in Russia will  be negatively affected by trade liberalization.   A growing body of research looking at economic and physical linkages between trade, environment and development shows that  these linkages are often complex and interdependent. 
 
Scientists have implicated that from an economic perspective, trade liberalization and environment are related because most economic output is  based on input from the environment, including the energy for processing them, and waste released to environment.  However, the effect of trade liberalization  on the environment would vary depending on  sector, country policies, markets, technologies and management systems. Changes in environmental quality as a result of potential expansion of “dirty industries” (e.g., ferrous and non- ferrous metals, chemicals) could be mitigated by effective and transparent enforcement mechanisms.  Russia’s economic gains from trade liberalization are estimated at  about $49 billion annually.  For these gains to be environmentally sustainable, it will be crucial to implement complementary “do-no-harm” policies tailored to address environmental concerns. This  will be pivotal in  sustaining the sources of gains from WTO accession in the long run.
 
So how does trade liberalization affect environmental quality?

There is a positive correlation between trade and environment. The wealth that trade liberalization creates tends to generate a demand for environmental improvements; and trade liberalization induces efficiency gains from more effective use of resources and lower  waste generation.  Increased access to global markets and growing trade cooperation will create national wealth that can be used for environmental protection .
 
Trade liberalization will create consumer surpluses associated with falling prices or increased quality. There will be structural changes associated with trade liberalization. The effect is that certain economic sectors or activities will be reduced because their products can be imported at a lower cost or higher quality.  Sectors that are  likely less susceptible to innovation may not benefit from the resources associated with higher growth. Such sectors could present specific environmental problems that will require policy-makers’ attention.
 
Trade liberalization could induce reallocation of resources within Russia with some sectors expanding and others  contracting. If expanding sectors are more pollution-intensive than contracting sectors, the  reallocation of output will not be neutral to the environment – unless  countermeasures are put in place to reduce pollution. 
 
These and other challenging aspects of  trade and environment  and the key  measures that can be taken by  Russian policy and decision makers were discussed  in Moscow at a consultation event on a  draft report titled Environmental Perspective of Russia’s WTO Accession. The report is intended to be the starting point for a much broader policy dialogue on the opportunities and challenges associated with trade liberalization concerning environment.
 
By adding an environmental dimension to the earlier research on the economy-wide impacts of WTO carried out by the World Bank, the analysis addresses a specific question :  what are the environmental prospects of WTO accession and what policies can  be implemented that will allow Russia to achieve environmentally sustainable growth? The report responds to the question by reflecting on three aspects of economic development associated with trade liberalization: change in production output (the scale effect), sector mix (the composition effect), and productivity (the technique effect). It highlights how Russia’s accession to the WTO might acerbate environmental challenges and how the economic gains from trade liberalization could be used in part  to better protect  the environment.

Comments

Submitted by Mikhail Kraskovskiy on

As a current citizen of the Russian Federation residing in Canada, I can quite openly say that hunting, fishing and logging systems and policies seem to be a lot more strict here in Canada. I believe that Russia could do with a lot more environmental regulation, such as oil development and waste reuse, so it doesn't have the same effect on the immediate environment as Alberta does. Also, forested areas should be preserved for nature and yet some would be used for the logging industry.

Submitted by Yves Sirdey on

I have worked in Russia in the field of environnement for over 8 years now! I think before accession to WTO brings any progress in local ecology, not to speak about sustainable development, much work has to be done just in passing new legislation and pressing local authorities to implement them! If not any benefit will just be straight in the pocket of company owners!

Add new comment

Plain text

  • Allowed HTML tags: <br> <p>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.