Syndicate content

How to test water quality? Chemical tests for limited budgets

Jessica Anne Lawson's picture
This page in: Français | Español | 中文
Editor’s note: this is the second piece of the blog series on low-tech water quality monitoring options.

Thanks to modern chemistry, we can detect thousands of chemicals in water, even at extremely low concentrations.  The ever-growing list of tests that are available can feel overwhelming, and the vast majority of methods require state-of-the art lab facilities. Fortunately, we don’t need to test for everything! A much smaller and more practical set of tests can provide a good sense of chemical water quality for monitoring purposes.  The good news is that there are low-tech versions of these tests for situations when budgets are limited.


Test formats

Typical low-tech, portable, field test methods for chemical water quality monitoring fall into three categories:
  • Test strips – These are small, single-use strips that change color to indicate the concentration of a specific chemical. Depending on the particular test, the user “activates” the paper or plastic strip by dipping it into the water sample and swishing it around, or by holding the strip in a stream of water. After waiting for a short time, the user compares the test strip color with a color chart to read the concentration of the chemical. These kits are extremely simple, but they are less accurate than other methods, especially if users don’t follow the instructions.
  • Color disk kits – Color disk test kits are available for a wide range of chemical tests.  In a typical set-up, the user adds a powder packet or a few drops of a liquid reagent to a water sample in a reusable plastic tube.  The user then places the sample tube in a small plastic viewing box.  This viewing box contains a plastic disk with a color gradient printed on it.  The user rotates the color disk to find the part that best matches the color of the sample, and then reads the concentration of the chemical from the disk.  Color disk kits typically have multiple steps and often include prescribed wait times, so they’re a little more complicated and costly, but generally more accurate.
  • Hand-held digital instruments – Lightweight and portable digital meters, colorimeters, and photometers are available for water testing.  They provide the most accurate results of these three testing methods, but they are also more expensive and delicate than the previous options.  These instruments require batteries and calibration.  While digital instruments are helpful to field technicians and are an essential part of any continuous or remote monitoring network, they are unlikely to be suitable for “citizen science” or crowdsourced water quality testing.

Chemical water quality parameters

Having identified various test formats, the next question is: What do we test for?  UNICEF recommends prioritizing fluoride, arsenic, and nitrate for chemical monitoring.  In areas where the earth is naturally rich in minerals that contain fluorine and arsenic, levels in well water can be high enough that chronic exposure is dangerous to human health.[1]  

How can we test for these elements?
  • Fluoride: At least one color disk test kit is available for fluoride. However, portable digital colorimeters are often preferred because of concerns over accuracy.  Ackvo Caddisfly, a testing system, recently described a colorimetric fluoride test that can be read by a smartphone app.
  • Arsenic: Portable field testing options for arsenic are limited; this contaminant is best measured in a laboratory.  Commercially available test kits do exist, but they are relatively complex and require several steps.  Although the arsenic concentrations “measured” with these test kits may be inaccurate, the kits do detect arsenic in nearly all samples greater than 100 micrograms per liter (ug/L), as well as in most samples in the 50-99 ug/L range. UNICEF has therefore recommended reporting arsenic monitoring results from these portable tests as “present” or “absent” using a reference concentration of 50 ug/L—the drinking water standard in many countries that are affected by natural arsenic contamination. 
  • Nitrate:  Both test strips and color disk test kits are available for nitrate testing. Nitrate can also be measured  with a digital meter. High levels of nutrients are associated with agricultural pollution from fertilizers (nitrogen and phosphorous) and animal waste (nitrogen).  Latrines, sewage, landfills, and industrial pollution can also contribute nitrogen.  Monitoring for nitrate is a simple way to assess the impacts of agricultural and human waste on water quality. 
Resources permitting, UNICEF suggests adding three more chemical parameters to monitoring programs: the naturally-occurring metals iron and manganese, and the overall total dissolved solids (TDS).  All three can cause taste and odor problems that might motivate consumers to seek out more appealing – and potentially unsafe – water sources.
  • Iron and Manganese: Both test strips and color disk tests are available for these two metals, which may also be measured using portable, digital instruments.  Field testing with digital equipment is considered reliable for iron and manganese.
  • TDS: TDS includes a mixture of inorganic salts, mostly sodium, chloride, potassium, calcium, and magnesium.  Rather than testing the particular components, TDS is monitored by measuring the conductivity of the water with a digital meter. There is no test strip or color disk kit that can be used here, although at least one conductivity meter interfaces with a smartphone.
In chlorinated distribution systems, it is important to monitor two more chemical parameters: pH and chlorine residual.
  • pH: pH test strips and color disk tests are widely available.  More expensive, higher-tech options include electrode-based pH meters. pH is a measure of hydrogen ion activity, which means that it tells us how acidic or basic the water is.  pH is not a pollutant, but it is a chemical master variable. It affects the behavior of other chemical constituents, including the effectiveness of residual chlorine against microbial contamination.  Sudden changes in pH can also reveal treatment plant failures or pollution events in natural water bodies (for example, illegal industrial discharge).
  • Chlorine: There are many easy ways to test residual chlorine, including test strips, color disks, and even kits designed for testing swimming pools. Portable digital meters also exist that can provide reliable, quantitative measurements.
Depending on local conditions and on the focus of a water quality monitoring project, more chemical tests can be added.  One might test for alkalinity or hardness, (including calcium, magnesium, etc.; field kits are available), chloride (an indicator of road salt or seawater intrusion; test kits exist), dissolved oxygen,[2] organic carbon levels (BOD, COD, TOC), agrochemicals (specific pesticides or fertilizers), or mining/industrial contaminants (e.g., polychlorinated biphenyls, cyanide). Finally, heavy metals like lead, mercury, copper, chromium, etc. are often of local interest. 

However, the vast majority of these additional tests are best performed in a laboratory given current technologies.  That said, low-tech testing – often involving a smartphone – is an area of active research for parameters like mercury and pesticides (also here).

Stay tuned for our next post, which will dive into microbial water quality testing!
 
[1] If previous testing has established that arsenic and fluoride are not a concern in a particular water system, these two parameters may be omitted in favor of more locally relevant ones.  Arsenic and fluoride contamination can also be caused by human activity like mining or industrial waste discharge.
[2] Low-tech dissolved oxygen tests require multiple steps with reagent additions followed by a drop-by-drop titration; some training may be necessary and results may be more variable than those of other test kits. Digital meters also exist.

Comments

Submitted by Ana Maria Nunez Torres on

Could you please provide recommendations for cadmium, boron and barium? We have found these substances in high concentration levels with arsenic.
Thank you.

Submitted by Dr. Bashir Y. Abubakar on

Hello, kindly, can we get the testing kits for our laboratory works. I have been involved in water clarification using Moringa seeds as an alternative to imported expensive chemical alum thus; http://news.psu.edu/story/358048/2015/06/09/research/researchers-study-inexpensive-process-clean-water-developing . I will be gld to have the kits to assist in my research. Thank you.

Submitted by Gabriel Ajala on

Thanks ForSharing.please, Where In Nigeria Can I Obtain This Testing Kits And Deep Meter For Borehole Depth/Static Water Level .I Am Into Drilling Windmills,And Water Development Consultancy.

Submitted by effect on

Hi cоllеagueѕ, fastidious post and good argᥙments commented at this place,
I am really enjoying by these.

Submitted by A.Letzner on

Hi Jessica,
considering microbial water quality testing in developing countries please have a look at www.Letz-Test.com .
I would like to get in contact with you by email
thank you and best wishes
Adrian

Submitted by Esle Steyn on

I teach highs school students, does any of you have ideas to make tests for water quality real and easy for them. we are going to use the water from two local dams and a borehole. tap water, distilled water as the control and bottled water. Thanks

Submitted by KabirMG on

Our project on Water Monitoring
https://social-business-introduction.blogspot.ae/2017/11/iot-paas-for-langelier-index-water.html

Add new comment