“Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he will eat for a lifetime.” K’ung Fu-tzu (Confucius) , circa 500 BC.
This concern about how we do research at the Bank—and elsewhere—can be thought of as the outcome of a traditional “retailing model.” That means researchers investigate a specific issue over a period of time and produce a research product—a paper or volume—on their findings. This is then disseminated to the public, including other researchers and policy makers.
Much has changed since this retailing model first emerged. Dramatic changes in information technology have expanded the use of data, which makes more openness in research feasible.
It is time, then, to think about a new “wholesaling model,” under which the emphasis switches to producing the tools for others to do the research and providing open access to those tools.
There are three objectives for such an initiative. The first is to empower researchers in developing countries to do better research to inform development policy and development practice. This changes the focus of the traditional “capacity building” model from the task of “teaching the lessons from past research” to facilitating new learning in specific contexts.
Success in this endeavor will also help in the longer-term goal of expanding opportunities for a “collaborative retailing model,” under which Bank staff and academics in rich countries can work more closely with colleagues in developing countries as full peers, to the benefit of both.
The third goal is to help ensure more open and transparent policy analysis. The discipline of policy analysis—naturally dominated by economics—is increasingly sophisticated in its theories and methods. There are still long lags between the introduction of new theories and methods and their application to real-world problems. The Bank can play an important role in reducing the costs of understanding even the most sophisticated policy analysis, given that technical capabilities have increased among key stakeholders.
Through innovative uses of technology, the Bank is particularly well positioned to help increase access to data, information and experience. That way, it can better inform development policy debates and better engage direct stakeholders in those debates.
The Bank will need to become more deeply involved in producing tools to facilitate better development analysis and policy making by non-Bank researchers. These tools include public access development data, in particular survey data on households and enterprises, and surveys designs that are geared towards addressing the most important development issues. Importantly, the tools also include software applications for accessing and using existing data.
There are already some examples that point the way forward. The data tool PovcalNet is a case in point. This is an interactive software platform that provides free access to the data derived from (currently) 700 household surveys, allowing users to replicate the Bank’s global poverty counts and make their own estimates under different assumptions, such as alternative poverty lines. Before PovcalNet, users of the Bank’s estimates of the number of people living below $1 a day ($1.25 a day at 2005 purchasing-power parity) had to take the Bank’s numbers as given, because they could not check the calculations or try different assumptions. That has changed radically.
Another example can be found in an important new product of the Bank’s research department, ADePT. This is an innovative software program designed to simplify and speed up the production of standardized tables and graphs in many areas of economic analysis, focusing on the Bank’s analytic work at country and regional levels. ADePT is a free, stand-alone program, available for download to anyone in the world.
The retailing and wholesaling models are complements, not substitutes. Useful tools for research can best be developed by researchers in the practice of solving real-world problems and writing papers on the results. This is also essential for quality assurance, since the retailed research products must pass critical peer review. And close connectivity between retailing and wholesaling functions helps ensure that the tools conform to best practice from relevant technical literatures. Wholesale research tools of wide relevance are most likely to be produced and maintained by researchers who are themselves actively engaged in analysis that utilizes these data.
There are also a number of differences between the two models. Tool development is typically a longer-term effort, for which continuity is key to success. The work invariably involves teams, rather than individuals. Software development also requires a sufficiently large user base, which takes times to develop. It also requires constant effort in supporting, improving and updating, without which the software tools will die. It also requires support in dissemination, marketing, training and (crucially) user support.
Looking forward, the Bank’s researchers will continue to have a crucial role in developing the ideas and methods that are needed for better development policy making. Looking forward, the retailing model will remain central to the effort of the Bank’s research department.
However, we will also be exploring new ways to wholesale our ideas and methods related to the changing world we work in. In so doing, we will expand opportunities for fuller partnerships with experts in the developing world.
This new model for how we do research will combine open access to data with open access to the analytic tools used to inform policy discussions using those data. Our vision is that data, the knowledge and the solutions to development problems will ultimately be generated collaboratively by those who have most to gain from the success of those solutions.