Syndicate content

Maximizing concessional resources with guarantees—a perspective on sovereigns and sub-nationals

Sebnem Erol Madan's picture

Photo: Debbie Hildreth Pisarcik | Flickr Creative Commons

Several years ago, after almost two decades at various investment banks, I joined the World Bank’s Financial Solutions team. I had always thought of the World Bank as the leading concessional lender to governments, the financial muscle behind large infrastructure projects, and the coveted supranational client of investment banks. I have since discovered the power of World Bank guarantees and how they can help borrowers maximize their World Bank country envelopes. Since joining, I have helped various clients raise over $2 billion in commercial finance. And all this with a fraction of World Bank exposure.

A success story from Pakistan

A recent example of such financing was for Pakistan. In June 2017, Pakistan successfully raised $700 million in international loan markets with the support of a World Bank guarantee. The guarantee was granted in the context of a Development Policy Financing (DPF) operation undertaken by the Ministry of Finance, supporting a program of reforms under two broad pillars: improved business environment, and enhanced fiscal management.

Not only could the guarantee help the government of Pakistan leverage limited concessional resources, but because of its flexibility could help access different markets, such as bond, loan or Shariah-compliant financing, depending on which market yielded the optimal result for Pakistan. The guarantee also signaled the Bank’s confidence in Pakistan’s economic reforms program to the market—which was particularly important after the successful completion of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) program almost a year earlier. This is a subtle benefit that people don’t usually think about.

With the support of the guarantee, the loan tenor Pakistan achieved was an unprecedented 10 years, together with significant cost savings. One of the concerns of borrowers accessing funding with guarantee support is that it takes too much time. However, the successful collaboration between Pakistan and World Bank teams meant the loan was in place only two months after market engagement with lenders--certainly a personal record for me!

Other important recent examples where guarantees were used to secure direct commercial borrowing were for Investment Project Financing (IPF) in Africa and South Asia, such as the $350 million Loan Facility for the Water and Power Development Authority (WAPDA) in Pakistan, which will partly finance the DASU hydropower plant, and the $500 million strategic refinancing for Kenya Power & Lighting Company.

DPF guarantee option versus DPF loans

The World Bank’s DPF operations are available to sovereigns and sub-nationals in support of specific policy reform programs and can be drawn in the form of two types of financing instruments: 1) a World Bank loan/credit or 2) a World Bank guarantee, called a policy-based guarantee. Combinations of loan/credit and guarantee are also possible.

Typically, borrowers have chosen to draw on the World Bank loan/credit, as these are the longest and cheapest form of financing available. However, policy-based guarantees can have significant benefits for sovereigns and sub-nationals looking to access larger volumes, as they would “crowd in” commercial financing while supporting their overall debt management objectives. I was pleasantly surprised to realize the World Bank Group’s government shareholders value the benefits of guarantees so much that they provide incentives for borrowers to utilize this type of financing.

Shareholders have agreed that the guarantees will utilize a fraction of the country envelope allocation versus a loan for all International Development Association (IDA) clients (the world’s poorest countries) and certain International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) clients.

In FY 16, IBRD commitments for DPF loans were $13.2 billion. A good percentage of these borrowers could have recouped significant volume, cost and tenor benefits in their commercial financings by utilizing the guarantee instrument of the World Bank instead of or in combination with a World Bank loan/credit. 

Accessing hard currency funding through guarantees

Sovereigns and sub-nationals have four main sources of hard currency borrowing: concessional borrowing, bilateral loans, international bond markets, and commercial bank loans.

While concessional and bilateral loans are very attractive with low cost and long tenors, there is a limit to their availability. International bond markets are very large and currently there is a huge demand for emerging market risk. However, during times of external volatility, public bond markets can close to riskier borrowers for extended periods of time. Sovereigns have started accessing the commercial bank lenders. However, tenors are limited and pricing is not cheap due to the illiquid nature of the loans and the funding costs of the lending banks

Guarantees can be used to access public bonds, private placements or commercial bank loans depending on the needs, characteristics and existing market access of the borrower. Zero-risk weighting attributed to World Bank guarantees under Basel 3 is also an advantage that leads to reduced cost and greater risk appetite among lenders. And just as importantly, the World Bank can bring along its network of financial institutions and experienced bankers within its Financial Solutions unit who can work at record speeds to find the correct market segment and help structure the proposal process and the financing to secure the optimal outcome for these borrowers.

I look forward to working with more sovereign and sub-national clients and World Bank teams to support access to this growing source of commercial financing. If you are interested in learning more about these products, visit the World Bank’s Guarantees Program webpage.

This is the second in a series of posts about the World Bank’s Guarantee Program.


Related posts:


Submitted by Daniel Tarka on

Fantastic,we certainly will appreciate your help with this instrument for a Cargo Airport Infrastructure project.

Submitted by Davide Parisse on

De-risking instruments are crucial for unlocking private capital. Unfortunately they are still used at a fraction of their potential

Submitted by S. Erol Madan on

Thank you for your comment. We are keen to improve on this by engaging more closely with governments, sponsors, investors and other relevant parties.

Submitted by S. Erol Madan on

Thank you for your comment. Guarantees can indeed be helpful in optimizing financing terms. They can be used in a targeted manner in the context of both public projects and PPP's .

Submitted by Dr. Mohamed Taher Abdelrazik Hamada, Ph.D on

Flexibility with guarantees from the World Bank helped to expose the developing countries to wide
markets that enable them to get the right choices in their infrastructure projects , as it is clear in ppps
(pubic private partnership projects) , even if loan /credit is a cheaper way among choices than the World
Bank guarantees , but it is evident that guarantees through the World Bank enable the emergng markets to reduce fiscal risks.
Yours Very Respectfully,
Dr. Mohamed Taher Abdelrazik Hamada, Ph.D

Submitted by S. Erol Madan on

Thank you for your comment. Given the volatility inherent in EM credit markets, and the limited concessional resources available, it is certainly critical for borrowers to diversify and grow their investor base, working towards optimal terms to support their development agenda.

Add new comment