World Bank Voices
Syndicate content

Climate Action Does Not Require Economic Sacrifice

Sri Mulyani Indrawati's picture
Also available in: 中文 | العربية | Français | Español
New Climate Economy Report

Action is urgently needed on climate change, but it does not have to come at the expense of economic growth.  This is the central message of the Global Commission on the Economy and Climate of which I am privileged to be a member. 
 
The New Climate Economy, a new report released by the commission, reinforces the view that major structural and technological changes in the global economy are now making it possible to achieve both: lower-carbon development and better economic growth. 
 
The report tells us that around US$90 trillion globally will be invested in cities, land use and energy infrastructure between now and 2030.  It’s clear that the investment choices we make today will shape future growth and will lock-in either a low or a high carbon pathway. 
 
The report sets out a detailed global action plan of practical recommendations that can achieve greater prosperity and a safer climate at the same time, such as phasing out subsidies for fossil fuels, restoring degraded forest lands and building better connected, more compact cities based on mass public transport. 
 
One of its key recommendations is the introduction of strong, predictable carbon prices in order to unlock investments and innovations in a low-carbon economy.  At the World Bank Group we agree.
 
A carbon price provides a necessary, if  insufficient, signal for investment in low-carbon and resilient growth.  Some policymakers may hesitate.  However, with an eye on their neighbors, many  leaders, faced with compelling economics, are unpacking complex politics around carbon pricing. 
 
Take the European Union and its Emissions Trading System.  The EU has been rightly commended for establishing the ETS, but this carbon market is experiencing serious difficulties,  partly because the recent recession reduced industrial demand for its tradable permits, but also because the market rules did not include any provision to adjust supply to economic shocks, and politics delayed the necessary rule change.
 
Other countries and states and provinces are learning from these experiences. The range of countries using carbon pricing shows that it can be done by high income and emerging economies alike. 
 
Today, almost 40 countries and more than 20 cities, states and provinces use mechanisms such as emissions trading systems and carbon taxes or are preparing to implement them.
 
China now houses the second largest collection of carbon markets in the world.  To date, it has launched seven pilot emissions trading systems in five cities and two provinces.  New carbon taxes were introduced in Mexico and France in 2013. The states of Oregon and Washington are exploring carbon pricing options to join California, Québec, and British Columbia in efforts to tackle climate change.  South Africa is planning to implement a carbon tax starting in 2016.
 
At the same time, the private sector has been increasingly outspoken in its support for putting a future price tag on our carbon footprint. Many companies, including house-hold names like Google, Walmart, and Shell, already use shadow pricing in their planning and investments.
 
Building on this momentum, the World Bank Group is encouraging corporate and government leaders to register their support for the Put a Price on Carbon statement.   
 
In the statement, governments pledge to work together and companies pledge to work with governments towards the long-term objective of carbon pricing used throughout the global economy.
 
As the New Climate Economy report and our reports makes clear, consistent and credible government policy signals are essential for businesses and investors to create jobs, growth and spur innovation.
 
It is one more voice reminding us that smart policy choices can deliver economic and climate benefits.

Comments

Submitted by mouhamadou moustapha lo on

I totally agreed on this point of view. It is quite possible to conciliate both objectives : growth and environment. Last year i wrote a new book with a title in french : croissance economique et environnement : entre l economique et l ethique. I do appreciate this blog. very relevant.

Submitted by Oscar S. Simanjuntak MEng. on

Emission Trading System and the carbon tax are great ways for companies and power producers to finally internalize the environmental externalities of their products and services. They should calculate the cost of damage that their companies are doing to the environment as a part of their operational cost. This will bring them to the conclusion that indeed, clean renewable energies and practices are more economical than coal based ones. That is why I'm following Mrs. Wandee Khunchornyakong great work in Thailand to install utility scale solar power plants in our country Indonesia. With the cost of renewable technologies going down, going green is becoming more economical than ever. We would love to ask for your advice on our renewable energy plans Bu Mulyani, if you have some time to spare please contact me at oscarsim21@gmail.com and we will email our plans to you. Kind Regards,

Submitted by Hari Bagindo Pasariboe on

Emission Trading System is a very unfamiliar jargon in Indonesia economics activity. The current extreme weather occurrence of smoke and haze due to fires in several province in Indonesia had polluted the air and emitted carbon dioxide to the air. The haze and smoke had caused increasing health and respiratory problem especially to young children and adult.

Any body willing and trying to measure how much carbon emission regarding smoke and haze due to fires??

climate action indeed need action and economic sacrifice

Warmest Regard
Hari Bagindo Pasariboe

Add new comment

Plain text

  • Allowed HTML tags: <br> <p>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.