From Sumatra to Haiti, the importance of increasing government capacity in responding to disaster


This page in:

In Indonesia, a national disaster management agency was set up in 2008 to serve as a guardian of disaster risk management. The agency's important role was clear in the aftermath of a West Sumatra earthquake in 2009.

The unprecedented earthquake in Haiti and the massive destruction it caused reminds me of the significant destruction that resulted after the Aceh tsunami five years ago. The Haiti earthquake hit the country’s capital, Port-au-Prince, which is the center of government and economic activities.

The combination of enormous damage on facilities and infrastructure, the collapse of the national government function, and the lack of preparedness and experience make it inevitable that the people of Haiti will rely on the international community for guidance and coordination. This situation is different from what happened in Aceh after the 2004 tsunami. At that time, although the devastation was also severe and affected a large part of Aceh, it did not affect the country’s capital city. The Government of Indonesia, which is located in Jakarta, remained fully functional and was able to coordinate the emergency response, disaster assessment, and reconstruction effort that followed. The government was also able to set up reconstruction agency in only a matter of months after the disaster.

Looking back to those years, it seems that the Indonesia Government has since built a lot of capacity and gained more confidence in handling disasters and conducting post-disaster assessments. After the tsunami, the government’s effort to conduct a damage and loss assessment was largely supported by international partners. The tsunami assessment was a marking point for the government in utilising an established methodology and more systematic approach to assess damage and losses, as developed by the UN’s Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). When another major disaster happened in Jogyakarta in 2006 (pdf), the Government proved to be more proficient in conducting the assessment and still continues to develop the country’s capacity in disaster management, a skill which is very much needed in a country such as Indonesia that is prone to disasters. Disaster management laws were issued in 2007 and a national disaster management agency (BNPB) was set up in 2008 as a guardian of disaster risk management in Indonesia.

BNPB’s role in responding to disasters was strongly demonstrated in the West Sumatra earthquake in 2009. As the appointed national agency for disaster management, it provided the overall coordination and worked very closely with provincial and local governments. The capacity of the BNPB to lead the assessment and their knowledge on the assessment method was evident. Clear guidance was provided to the team on the field situation, response plans, and on the expectations of government. Smaller group meetings based on different sectors were set up to have focused discussions on data and situation analysis. The local governments also made a huge contribution by providing and compiling data in a short time period from the various areas across the affected province. Strong knowledge, commitment, enthusiasm, and hard work are obviously exposed in the process.

Being involved in the previous disaster has made me realize how well the capacity of the government has evolved during the last five years. It is evident that the Government of Indonesia has learned important lessons from past disasters in how to better respond when disasters strike, and it is continuously evolving – perhaps not yet to a maximal point, but has already reached higher ground. It also seems that the fruit of extensive efforts are now ripening.

As I praise the Indonesian government, and as I remember how costly and destructive a disaster can be, I think it might be helpful to remind them that work still needs to be completed on mitigating future disasters – particularly as the country is located in the hot spot zone for earthquake. As the growing consensus says, “Disasters perhaps cannot be prevented, but the disaster’s damage and losses can be.”

Photo courtesy John Orford under a Creative Commons license.


Join the Conversation

January 25, 2010

this is great,
it needs to give more concern in provincial and regional/municipal level that they need to improve their capacity to reduce the risk as urged by Indonesia Disaster Management Law (give them more support and assistance), but the importance is about community level disaster risk reduction, because for the next future, the community capacity is more important rather the government itself (to make them integrated in action is the important one).

we can't relying on the government itself, but relying on the community is not wise solution. let us improve our preparedness because we live in disaster prone area, yes that's it Indonesia. we have a lot of work to do;

how can we reach them to improve their capacity; those who are living in remotely area, small islands and other coastal region throughout Indonesia. that's our work to them

Permana Yudiarso

Cut Dian
January 25, 2010

Thanks Wolfgang, supporting the WS DALA has indeed been another great experience for me. I might not be able to provide comparison on monitoring the reconstruction progress of Sumatera as I am not quite involved in it, but perhaps I can share something later on monitoring the money based of course on our experience in Aceh as a comparison for Haiti. But I guess, we'll see first how the Haiti come out with the plan of tracking the aid.

January 20, 2010

Dear Dian,

congratulations to this excellent blog post and for delivering another high-quality Damage and Loss Assessment. The quality of these assessment is the foundation for a successful reconstruction program. I hope in your next blog post you can explain how you monitor the reconstruction progress in Sumatra and what lessons you draw for Haiti.