Fertilizer prices expected to remain higher for longer

|

This page in:

Image of  a person fertilizing a tomato plant inside a greenhouse.
Photo: Valentin Valkov/Shutterstock

This blog is the third in a series of 11 blogs on commodity market developments, elaborating on themes discussed in the April 2022 edition of the World Bank’s Commodity Markets Outlook

Fertilizer prices have risen nearly 30% since the start of 2022, following last year’s 80% surge.  Soaring prices are driven by a confluence of factors, including surging input costs, supply disruptions caused by sanctions (Belarus and Russia), and export restrictions (China). Urea prices have surpassed their 2008 peaks, while phosphates and potash prices are inching closer to 2008 levels. Concerns around fertilizer affordability and availability have been amplified by the war in Ukraine.


Record-high input costs. Rising natural gas prices, especially in Europe, led to widespread production cutbacks in ammonia—an important input for nitrogen-based fertilizers.  Similarly, soaring prices of coal in China, the main feedstock for ammonia production there, forced fertilizer factories to cut production, which contributed to the increase in urea prices. Higher prices of ammonia and sulfur have also driven up phosphate fertilizer prices.

fertilizer input costs


Sanctions and export restrictions. Fertilizer prices rose in response to the war in Ukraine, reflecting the impact of economic sanctions and disruptions in Black Sea trading routes. Russia accounts for about 16% of global urea exports and 12% of DAP and MAP exports , while Russia and Belarus together make up two-fifths of global MOP exports. Adding to supply concerns, China has suspended exports of fertilizers until at least June 2022 to ensure domestic availability.

Recent fertilizer prices


Supply disruptions. Although urea and DAP prices have retracted in recent weeks due to lower tender offers in India as buyers await clarity on Indian fertilizer subsidies, potash prices show no signs of easing. Potash supply shortages and uncertainty have increased following fresh sanctions on Belarus and Russia (on top of the sanctions imposed on Belarus last year).  Moreover, Lithuania has halted the use of its railways’ network to transport Belarusian potash to the port of Klaipeda, which typically handles 90% of Belarusian fertilizer exports.

Belarus, Russia, and Ukraine imports


Robust demand. Global fertilizer consumption has remained strong throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Brazil and the United States have allocated record acreage to soybean (a fertilizer-intensive crop). Demand is also strong in China due to increased feed use, especially maize and soybean meal, as the country is rebuilding its hog herd population following the African swine fever outbreak. Fertilizers are now at their least affordable levels since the 2008 global food crisis, despite higher crop prices, which may limit fertilizer use. 


Outlook and risks. Urea prices are expected to remain at historically high levels for as long as natural gas and coal prices remain elevated. Similarly, DAP prices are projected to remain high until ammonia and sulfur prices ease.  Apart from input costs, risks to the outlook depend on whether China’s urea and DAP exports will resume after June. For potash, prices are anticipated to remain historically high through the next year unless supply returns to international markets from Russia and Belarus.

Top Fertilizer Consumers

Authors

John Baffes

Senior Agriculture Economist, Development Economics Prospects Group

Wee Chian Koh

Researcher, Centre for Strategic and Policy Studies, Brunei Darussalam

Join the Conversation