Photo: Japanexperterna | Flickr Creative Commons
The world is crying out for new infrastructure. In emerging market countries, growing populations and rapid urbanization mean that cities are struggling to keep pace with the needs of citizens. Meanwhile, infrastructure is outdated in many developed countries.
Yet there is a $1 trillion annual shortfall in infrastructure investment, mostly in emerging markets. At the same time, there are billions of dollars in debt capital seeking secure and healthy returns.
Given the long-term, stable cash flows of many infrastructure projects, it seems the perfect destination for such capital. But in large part, this investment is not taking place. What will it take to increase the supply of well-structured projects?
Matching capital to infrastructure’s risk attributes
Infrastructure projects are most efficiently funded in local currencies, since most costs and revenues streams are also in local currency.
In developed markets FX risk is limited and can be mitigated cost-effectively if necessary. Consequently, bank lending to many developed market projects is relatively robust. The big challenge is to match the capital available to the risk attributes that underlie infrastructure projects in emerging markets.
At the moment, the world’s markets are doing a far-from-perfect job. According to league tables, 49% of the $380 billion in debt financing raised in 2016 was emerging market project finance . But nearly half of it was financed in U.S. dollars, since the U.S. dollar credit market can accommodate long duration debt—which infrastructure projects typically require — while local currency markets cannot.
With little long-term funding availability in local currency markets, many infrastructure projects don’t get off the starting blocks. In many instances, projects are simply not suitable for U.S. dollar funding because volatility resulting from currency fluctuations would create unsustainable risks.
Many emerging market sovereigns have limited leeway to raise finance for infrastructure investment. Development financial institutions, agencies and international organizations already play a pivotal role in financing and facilitating emerging market infrastructure investment. Now they need to address the challenge of FX risk to scale for greater private sector investment. The financial community must also take a more proactive approach to overcoming the FX challenge.
Mitigating FX risk to bridge the infrastructure gap
Fortunately, there are approaches that can be implemented now. At a roundtable session hosted by Citi on the sidelines of the World Bank Group-IMF Spring Meetings, several strategies for tackling FX risk were shared that could break the logjam in infrastructure investment:
- Liquidity-focused derivatives market strategies. Currency risk can be hedged with short-term (forward) contracts for the required value; these would be periodically rolled over or renewed at expiry. While an increase in the cost of hedging is a risk—potentially affecting the project’s debt-servicing ability—a supranational or development financial institution “Liquidity Facility” could mitigate it. Another example is hedging currency risk using a proxy strategy on a correlated currency or portfolio of correlated currencies, with the aim of attaining a larger hedge amount than the one available in the single-currency swap market.
- Derivative and debt capital market blended solutions. Currency risk can be hedged by accessing proxy-currency investors to raise funding in a correlated currency. For example, a Colombian project might be funded in Mexican pesos or Chilean pesos rather than U.S. dollars. Currency risk can also be hedged by funding projects in local currency with offshore risk-takers that provide U.S. dollar collateral such as treasury bills—kept offshore.
- Sovereign- and multilateral-driven solutions. Issuing an emerging market "infrastructure currency hedge bond program" through a local currency, medium-term note program that trades at a discount to comparable AAA-rated benchmarks would provide swap market liquidity to hedge local currency projects. Alternatively, a local development bank could lend in local currency to international banks or supranationals, which would on-lend the funds to local projects. No derivative execution is required, which solves both currency and cross-border risk.
Making a real differenceA standardized, systemic approach to emerging market infrastructure FX risk isn’t going to appear overnight. The regulatory environment, political idiosyncrasies related to each emerging market jurisdiction, local banking liquidity, undeveloped swap markets and varying levels of foreign investors’ appetite for a given local currency will likely hold things up for years to come.
Nevertheless, a coordinated approach to addressing FX risk across the private sector financial community, development financial institutions, agencies and international organizations could boost efforts to attract international investors into emerging market infrastructure assets. This work has already begun. For example, Citi is working with the World Bank’s Global Infrastructure Facility (GIF) and others to address ways of mitigating risk and attracting commercial financing for infrastructure in emerging markets and developing countries. This will likely feature prominently at a forthcoming meeting of the GIF’s Advisory Council, of which Citi is a member and the outgoing co-chair.
Collaboration on this important issue is already underway. And that could build a better future for us all.
 Source Dealogic 2016
Disclaimer: The content of this blog does not necessarily reflect the views of the World Bank Group, its Board of Executive Directors, staff or the governments it represents. The World Bank Group does not guarantee the accuracy of the data, findings, or analysis in this post.