When China met Africa


This page in:

China’s expanding presence in Sub-Saharan Africa has been a major catalyst for growth in the region. Contrary to widespread opinion, its engagement covers all aspects of development. Stronger domestic policies will help countries in the region increase the gains from this growing partnership.

A few years back, I had the opportunity to attend a documentary screening of “When China Met Africa” at the Freer Gallery in D.C. Set in Zambia, the film follows the lives of a Chinese farmer, a Chinese foreman under pressure to complete a highway expansion project, and Zambia's trade minister, whose negotiations with the Chinese government could bring in millions of investment dollars.

The film provides a fascinating fly-on-the-wall account of the impact of China on Zambia, both good and bad. But what struck me was that the relationship is complex, multi-layered and evolving. There are palpable frictions, as two great and very different civilizations come together (and plenty of miscommunication as the film shows), but also myriad opportunities.

What China brings to the table

Take trade, which has risen from negligible levels in 2000 to more than $170 billion in 2013, and which has surpassed that with the U.S. While commodities dominate Sub-Saharan Africa’s (SSA) exports to China, as we discuss in the June Global Economic Prospects report, exports to the U.S., the EU, and major emerging market economies are even more concentrated in commodities (Figure 1).  

Figure 1 Sub-Saharan Africa’s commodity exports to major trading partners, 2013
Source: Comtrade

But African manufacturers also have increasing access to Chinese markets, and exports are rising (Figure 2). In part this reflects Chinese firms’ efforts to develop global value-chains in the region. Examples include investment in manufacturing clusters in Ethiopia (glass, fur, footwear, and automobiles), Mali (sugar refineries), and Uganda (textiles and steel pipe manufacturing). Added to this, since 2012 China has eliminated tariffs for 30 least developed African countries (covering about 60 percent of their exports).

Figure 2: Sub-Saharan Africa’s manufacturing exports to China
Source: Comtrade

Meanwhile, cheaper Chinese manufactured and capital goods are displacing more expensive African imports from the U.S. and the EU. A third of SSA imports from China comprise capital goods, while consumer goods such as fridges, TVs, and other manufactured goods make up the rest. Imports of the latter are about three times as large as manufactured goods imports from the U.S. and the EU.

Furthermore, China is the largest developing country foreign investor in Africa. Although estimates vary across data sources, the officially reported stock of Chinese FDI in Africa was estimated at $21 billion in 2012, a doubling since 2009. China has emerged as a major source of exploration and development finance, including in major metals and minerals projects, and infrastructure investments (Côte d’Ivoire, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Uganda). Chinese investment in other sectors is also substantial, including in manufacturing (Figure 3).

Figure 3 Chinese foreign direct investment in Africa, by sector, 2012
Source: Government of China.

Finally, Africa received nearly half of the cumulative (starting from the 1960s through to 2012) $54 billion provided by China in global foreign aid, significantly more than any other region. Although current Chinese aid is much lower than aggregate aid from OECD ($3.2 billion in 2013 vs $26 billion) it has increased rapidly in recent years as OECD disbursements have declined (Figure 4). And Chinese assistance to social development projects such as the construction of schools, hospitals, and water supply systems is also increasing, as is the aid being channeled through multilateral development banks.

Figure 4. Chinese development assistance and bilateral aid from OECD countries to Sub-Saharan Africa, 2005–13
Sources: OECD; Chinese Statistical Yearbook; MOFCOM.
Cited from http://www.chinaafricarealstory.com/p/chinese-aid.html.
Note: OECD = Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Africa with China vs. Africa without China

China has already transformed Africa. Its growing presence has supported growth, filled important infrastructure gaps, and encouraged supply-chain integration. (Improved infrastructure is estimated to have contributed more than half of Africa’s growth performance in the pre-2008 decade.) Chinese FDI has had a significant impact on growth in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Madagascar, Nigeria, and Zambia.

African consumers have benefited from cheaper Chinese imports, although there has been some displacement of local industries.  Chinese finance, which is often packaged as a combination of aid, trade terms, and investment finance, has broadened choices for African governments.

However, slower growth in China has contributed to downward pressure on global commodity prices and is taking a toll on resource-rich SSA countries. That said, over the medium term Chinese economic engagement should continue to grow, as reflected in recent proposals by the Chinese government to invest in regional rail networks, eventually linking five East African countries. This also comes across in “When Africa Met China,” which shows the determination, pragmatism, and the work ethic of Chinese businessmen looking to engage over the long-haul in a continent that has been overlooked by other outside investors for too long.

What next?

African policy makers need to leverage this growing partnership, but keep in mind that it is not the only one. For all of the benefits that China brings to the continent, policy makers should remember that several other major emerging economies have an interest in the region, its resources, and its markets. And traditional OECD partners also remain important – the  magnitude of their aid, investment, and trade flows is (in aggregate) larger than that from China. Evidence also suggests that SSA is failing to fully exploit its comparative advantage in agriculture to expand its export presence China, likely reflecting structural inefficiencies and logistical constraints.

African leaders need to focus on improving domestic policies that reform institutions, increase transparency (especially in mining), improve business environments, and promote the development of human capital. This would encourage investment, both domestic and foreign.

African policy makers would also benefit from closer economic cooperation among themselves – for instance, harmonizing laws and facilitating cross-border business and collaboration. This could strengthen their bargaining, lower the costs of bureaucracy, and improve competitiveness.


Join the Conversation

August 07, 2015

Great overview. I think that the next step to this analysis would be to disaggregate the investment/behavior because there is significant diversity. There is no one China - but a plethora of private/public actors that are arriving to SSA and impacting the region in diverse ways.
Furthermore, there is also significant investment in the oil sector that you didn't touch upon but that would also be interesting to look at particularly in how they compare with investments in mining.
Congrats again for a great piece.

Dr Md Nasir Uddin
August 08, 2015

The deep insight into SSA as emerging economically with Chinese FDI by Dr Tehmina Khan is a brilliant analytical piece to read. It would be quite interesting to know as to why OECD contribution is declining to SSA economies. Is it because China comes with soft loan and liberal conditionalities that actually prompted injecting to SSA economies.It would be interesting to know if the investment by MDBs has gone up or not due to Chinese inroad to countries there aspiring to attain economic growth.

August 08, 2015

Impressive Overview.
My Question is that if Chinese growth rate decrease as expected, what will be its impact on Chinese economic engagement with SSA?