This is an exciting time to be working on climate change, especially in the Bank.
Various conclusive reports and developments in 2007 (the 4th IPCC report, the Nobel Peace Prize, etc) placed the challenge of climate change firmly in the consciousness of the development community. Following on this, the Climate talks in Bali (December 3-14, 2007) confirmed the roadmap for a global effort at addressing the climate challenge, with an agreement on process that included all key players, notably the USA, in whatever emissions control regime was determined as appropriate after the first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol. This regime will be largely finalized, hopefully, by December 2009.
The Bank is moving actively to help and facilitate this process, and to support the four pillars emerging from Bali (adaptation to climate change, mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions, transfer of technology to facilitate this, and financing mechanisms to support the entire process). We also see that major donor governments are asking the Bank to establish new financing mechanisms, and we are being challenged to lead on this ultimate development challenge of our times.
Late last year, the Bank's Board approved establishment of two new Funds to sustain the carbon market: the Carbon Partnership Facility and the Forest Carbon Partnership Facility. Every day in the Sustainable Development Network Week Program (a gathering of all Bank staff working on these issues) taking place this week, we see a strong climate agenda in the training capsule being offered, inviting staff to explore and understand the issues as they relate to various specific thematic sectors and to raise their game to meet these emerging development challenges.
Share your thinking on this. Is climate change here to stay as the key development challenge defining our generation and that of our children? Or is it just the flavor of the decade? Is this the right time for all this, or too early, or too late? Are we going too far, or not far enough? Should we do different things, or are there things we should do differently?
Join the Conversation
Indeed, combating climate change is everyone's business, and should be a joint effort. However, there must be a global acceptance that there are those who bear more of both historical and recurrent responsibility towards climate change. With this acceptance, should be a clear assignment of responsibility towards ensuring that there is reversal of such effect. In this article, there is a clear statement... on need for water sector to adapt, yet very little effort is made at the climate talks, COP 21, to elevate the reality that many communities across the world need to do exactly that. For the water sector, and the development sphere to be able to cope with the impact of a continually changing climate, adaptation must be at the core of any agreement reached in Paris.
Read more Read lessthe rate of evaporation varies a great deal, depending on temperature and relative humidity, which impacts the amount of water available to replenish groundwater supplies. The combination of shorter duration but more intense rainfall (meaning more runoff and less infiltration) combined with increased evapotranspiration (the sum of evaporation and plant transpiration from the earth's land surface to... atmosphere) and increased irrigation is expected to lead to groundwater depletion (Konikow and Kendy 2005).
Read more Read less