From fear to opportunity: Making AI work for education

As education experts at the World Bank and, more importantly, as parents, we deeply understand the apprehension surrounding artificial intelligence in our classrooms. The fears aren't abstract for us - they're personal. Like many parents and educators, we grapple with questions about how these technologies will shape the next generation’s learning experience. The fear is not unfounded - we're witnessing the most significant technological revolution ever, according to some, and at least at the level of the steam engine or electricity. And it is probably the most significant transformation in education since the printing press. Critics raise valid concerns about its impact on equity, effectiveness, and the very nature of learning itself. But AI is already present in most aspects of life. That is precisely why we need to confront these challenging questions head-on.

Here we address four critical questions we hear from educators, parents, and policymakers across Latin America:

1. Isn't promoting AI irresponsible when many schools lack the minimum conditions to operate?

This is a false choice. Yes, many schools still need fundamental infrastructure and well-qualified teachers. But technology, properly implemented, can help close these gaps faster. Teachers can receive better training, learning materials can reach remote areas quickly, and students who need extra support can get it more effectively.

The evidence is promising: in Ecuador, a teacher-guided AI tutoring program achieved significant mathematics improvements at just $18 per student. Missing this opportunity would only ensure that existing gaps widen further.

2. How do we ensure AI serves our communities, not the other way around?

The concern about technological sovereignty is legitimate. As AI systems are primarily developed in the Global North, we risk missing crucial local needs – from native language content to culturally relevant teaching approaches. But the solution isn't rejection; it's strategic engagement.

We need concrete actions:

• Developing local AI talent through targeted scholarships and training
• Creating partnerships for local language content development
• Establishing clear regulatory frameworks that protect data sovereignty
• Building teachers’ digital skills through comprehensive training programs

Uruguay's example shows what is possible: they've developed guidelines for AI use that respect local teaching methods while leveraging AI advances. Their framework ensures technology serves their educational goals, not the other way around.

3. Won't students just use AI to avoid real learning?

This is one of the most pressing concerns we hear from teachers and parents alike. There's a legitimate fear that tools like ChatGPT will become a crutch, leading to intellectual laziness and superficial learning. Fire can either cook your meal or burn down your house – it all depends on how you use it. The same applies to technology in education.

Let's be honest: copying is not new - students have been finding shortcuts since the invention of writing. From asking your smart sibling to write your essay to sharing homework answers, cheating has always existed. What is different now is not the behavior but the sophistication of the tools. This presents an opportunity to fundamentally rethink how we teach and assess learning.

Technology can facilitate focusing on what truly matters: developing higher-order thinking skills, creativity, and critical analysis. Preliminary findings from our pilot programs in Nigeria shows something fascinating: when properly guided, students who learn to use AI tools thoughtfully actually engage more deeply with the material. Instead of asking students to summarize texts (which AI can do instantly), teachers can guide them to critique AI-generated analyses, compare different AI interpretations, or use AI as a brainstorming partner while developing their own ideas.

And here is the key insight: a good teacher has always been able to encourage critical thinking through thoughtful conversations. But any parent of teenagers knows just how challenging it is to encourage critical thinking – now imagine doing it with thirty students at once! Now AI can help more teachers prepare effective lesson plans and activities for these very difficult-to-teach skills.

4. How do we implement AI responsibly in schools?

Education is a field that desperately needs more scientific evidence about what works. Here is a startling reality: while medical research rapidly translates into changes in doctors' offices, educational research often struggles to reach classroom practice. But with AI, we can change this pattern.

The key lies in adopting the same evidence-based approach we use in medicine, pharmaceuticals, or food safety – moving forward thoughtfully without becoming paralyzed by fear of innovation. Just as we would not introduce a new medical procedure or food additive without proper testing, we need a systematic approach to AI in education:

• Clear regulatory frameworks for AI implementation
• Rigorous evaluation processes before large-scale deployments. And then continuous iterative adaptation
• Active participation from the educational community in evaluation and adaptation to ensure real-world effectiveness

The Path Forward

The future of education will be inevitably influenced by technological changes. With intelligence and creativity, we can use these tools to help schools, teachers, and students who need the most support. Success depends on making smart investments while keeping the human element at the center.

Remember: education is fundamentally about human interaction. AI should make this interaction more effective and enjoyable; it won’t replace it. By focusing on this principle, we can ensure that technology serves our educational values, not the other way around.

To receive weekly articles, sign-up here