Multilateral development institutions, including the World Bank Group, hold a variety of tools in their arsenal to fight fraud and corruption. One such tool is the use of administrative sanctions to protect Bank-financed projects from misconduct. These sanctions, typically debarments, “blacklist” companies or individuals found to have engaged in fraudulent or corrupt misconduct from participating as contractors, suppliers, consultants, sub-contractors, or service providers in future projects financed by the sanctioning bank.
In April 2010, five of the world’s largest multilateral development banks (MDBs) – the World Bank Group, the African Development Bank Group, the Asian Development Bank, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, and the Inter-American Bank Group – signed the Agreement for Mutual Enforcement of Debarment Decisions, also known as the Cross-Debarment Agreement. The Agreement, a culmination of years of collaborative work among MDBs to harmonize their approaches to fighting fraud and corruption, allowed each institution to efficiently recognize and enforce certain debarment decisions issued by the others, provided specific conditions were met.
For every MDB, cases of fraud and corruption divert scarce funds from their intended beneficiaries – communities in need of emergency assistance, reconstruction, or economic development. In response to such risks, many MDBs independently established accountability mechanisms known as “sanctions systems” that allowed for robust investigation and independent decision-making. These systems enabled the banks to exclude corrupt actors from working on bank-financed projects via a rules-based process ensuring fairness, transparency, and consistency. Over just a few years, the mechanisms became more similar, more “harmonized.” As early as 2006, a group of international financial institutions (IFIs) agreed to establish a Joint IFI Anti-Corruption Task Force and signed the Uniform Framework for Preventing and Combating Fraud and Corruption, which included common definitions of misconduct and expressed support for anticorruption efforts among the IFIs’ member countries
However, one problem became apparent – some corrupt and fraudulent actors worked in different markets, bidding on projects financed by different banks. Without coordination, the sanctions enforcement mechanisms risked becoming a game of whack-a-mole where an actor who had engaged in misconduct under projects financed by one bank, and had been debarred by that bank, could simply switch markets and work on projects supported by another MDB. Ensuring that bad actors were more fully excluded would require multiple costly and time-consuming cycles of investigation and sanction. An agreement to mutually recognize or “cross-debar” these entities was an elegant solution to the problem. If a company is found liable for one or more of the several sanctionable practices agreed by the MDBs and publicly debarred for one year or more by one bank, other signatories shall recognize the decision and apply the same debarment, unless there are institutional reasons prohibiting such recognition, or another limited exception applies.
Fifteen years after the signing, the Cross-Debarment Agreement has outperformed expectations. It has been used to extend the scope of sanctions for more than 1,500 companies and individuals from more than 80 countries and jurisdictions, responding to misconduct in projects across six continents. Numerous development projects have proceeded under a lower risk of misconduct as a result. It has also strengthened the general deterrent effect of MDB sanctions beyond the affected projects and incentivized companies to adopt preventive internal compliance programs to mitigate fraud and corruption risks.
And yet, more work remains to be done. As MDBs continue to refine and harmonize their sanctions systems, they must continue to ask questions about the impact of their debarments and the way in which their systems can improve further. As we mark the 15th anniversary of the Cross-Debarment Agreement, this is more than a moment to reflect – it is a call to action. This historic partnership is now a key part of how MDBs confront fraud and corruption through sanctions, and its impact continues to ripple across global development. The next 15 years hold even greater promise: deeper collaboration, smarter enforcement, and stronger safeguards for the communities we serve.
Join the Conversation