Published on Development Impact

Coping through acceptance: Intimate partner violence and attitudes dynamics. Guest post by Eugenia Frezza.

This page in:

This is the 18th in this year’s series of posts by PhD students on the job market.

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a global issue, and often, it is rationalised as a way to discipline women who do not conform to traditional household roles. A widespread tolerance for IPV exists even among its victims. Psychology suggests that victims adjust their attitudes to make sense of their experiences and maintain consistency between their attitudes and behaviours. This coping defence mechanism becomes even more salient when divorce – a potential avenue to escape – is socially stigmatised.

Traditionally, violence prevention strategies emphasise the role of shifting attitudes in order to reduce IPV. However, the factors influencing attitudes towards these harmful practices remain unexplained.  In my Job Market Paper, I study the causal effect of IPV on victims’ attitudes, and I turn the lens on whether tolerance of violence can act as a coping strategy, particularly under prolonged exposure to abuse and in contexts where divorce is not a viable option. 

Breaking the cycle: causal effect of IPV on tolerance towards violence

The main challenge in addressing this question is that the victims’ experience and tolerance of violence may mutually reinforce each other. For instance, if women cannot leave the relationship, they might cope with their partners' aggressive behaviours by justifying them (i.e., the coping mechanism). Conversely, women with a higher tolerance of violence might self-select into abusive relationships (i.e., the risk factor mechanism). These mechanisms may intertwine, forming a vicious cycle. As a result of such simultaneity bias, the relationship between violence and its tolerance is endogenous. Moreover, the relationship between experiencing violence and its tolerance may vary depending on whether we consider violence an isolated event or a recurrent issue.

The dynamics of tolerance in prolonged intimate partner violence

Assuming violence can be a recurrent issue, I identify the causal effect of IPV both theoretically and empirically. I use a simple conceptual framework to I explain how, in settings where divorce is not an option, the relationship between IPV and attitudes towards may vary depending on the length of exposure to abuse. In the short term, a victim might think violence is a one-off incident. Over time, with ongoing abuse, she may begin to internalize this violence, leading to an increased tolerance. This recalibration of expectations is progressive—the longer the exposure to IPV, the more likely it is that victims will rationalize and normalize the violence they have experienced as a coping strategy.

I empirically test this hypothesis in the context of India. India falls within the category of countries with the second highest prevalence of intimate partner violence in the world (WHO, 2021), with 31.7% of women experiencing IPV in their lifetime and 46% deeming it acceptable under certain circumstances. Moreover, divorce rates are extremely low; the 2011 Indian census records 1.36 million divorced individuals, constituting a mere 0.24% of the ever-married population (Jacob and Chattopadhyay, 2016). To isolate the causal effect of IPV on tolerance towards it, I leverage variations in the minimum legal drinking age. The rationale behind leveraging the minimum legal drinking age variation is that alcohol consumption often results in altered cognitive and physical capacities, potentially escalating the risk of inflicting violence due to reduced self-regulation. By leveraging the variation in the legal drinking age, I exploit a shock on alcohol consumption that is likely to increase the perpetration of violence, which, in turn, may affect the tolerance towards it. 

To analyse the causal relationship between intimate partner violence and attitudes in the short term, I use a regression-discontinuity (RD) design. Specifically, I study the impact of the prevalence of violence in the last 12 months on victims' tolerance thereof. I compare observationally equivalent couples who differ on whether their husband's age is above or below the minimum legal drinking age at the month of the interview. I use data from the 2005, 2015 and 2020 cycles of the National Family and Health Survey (NFHS) to measure the prevalence of intimate partner violence and the attitudes towards it. Victims’ tolerance of violence is assessed based on responses to questions regarding the justification of wife-beating under various scenarios, such as going out without permission, neglecting children, arguing, burning food, refusing sex, infidelity, or disrespecting in-laws. The NFHS collects information on the experience of IPV from a subsample of eligible women. For the analysis, I use the couple datasets, where the unit of observation is at the couple level.

To study the long-term effects of IPV on attitudes, I use an event study approach, comparing couples in Indian states with different legal drinking ages – 21 in some states and 25 in others. The hypothesis is that husbands who are allowed to drink after 21 are also more likely to start drinking earlier compared to husbands residing in states where the minimum-legal-drinking age (MLDA) is 25. Thus, the age at drinking— holding constant the duration of marriage — should affect the timing of the onset of violence. As a result, the duration of abuse is likely to be higher among couples residing in states where the partners are legally allowed to drink at a younger age. This variation in MLDA across states will enable me to investigate how the length of exposure to violence in the long term affects the attitudes towards it.  

Short- and long-term effects of IPV on tolerance towards it

In the short term, as the husbands reach the minimum legal drinking age, their wives' likelihood of experiencing IPV during the past year increases by 30 percent, and the likelihood of experiencing any frequent form of violence increases by 80 percent (4-5 percentage points), with no changes in tolerance (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Short-Term Effects of IPV on Tolerance

Figure 1: Short-Term Effects of IPV on Tolerance


In the long run, women report having experienced violence for six additional months on average in states where MLDA is lower (Figure 2). I also find that wives' exposure to violence increases their tolerance towards intimate partner violence (IPV) by up to 0.3 standard deviations four years after the partner has been legally allowed to drink. These findings suggest that the longer the duration of violence, the more the victims may find violence acceptable as a coping mechanism.

Figure 2: Long-Term Effects of IPV on Tolerance

Figure 2: Long-Term Effects of IPV on Tolerance

Take-aways and policy implications

There are two main takeaways from this study. First, a rise in the prevalence of intimate partner violence in the short term does not lead to a shift in the victims' attitudes toward violence. Instead, the length of exposure to abuse is the crucial factor in changing victims' acceptability of violence. Indeed, evidence indicates that long-term exposure to violence shifts women's attitudes towards violence. This suggests that over time, victims may normalise and rationalise the violence inflicted on them as a coping mechanism if they do not have an outside option. Taken together, the results may suggest the importance of early intervention strategies (e.g., school-based programs targeting adolescents or counselling services for young couples) to disrupt the cycle of violence and prevent the normalisation of such behaviours, and enhance victims’ access to external outside options.


Eugenia Frezza is a PhD Candidate at Trinity College, Dublin. Her main research interests are at the intersection between development and gender economics, with a focus on gender norms and intimate partner violence. For more about her research visit:

Join the Conversation

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly
Remaining characters: 1000