Why “inefficiency” is needed in energy financing for Africa


This page in:

Source: Andrew Heath for Practical Action

One of the most important findings noted at the Africa launch of the World Bank's Progress Toward Sustainable Energy: Global Tracking Framework 2015 (GTF) report for the Sustainable Energy for All initiative, is that despite recent trends to increase investment in the energy sector, we still need to double the number of new connections to modern energy services per year to reach universal access to energy by 2030.
Universalizing access to clean, modern energy services is at the heart of our ability to deliver on the new globally agreed sustainable development goals and climate agreements. Knowing this, the panel of experts discussing the findings of the report at the Africa Energy Indaba was asked a key question by Anita Marangoly George, Senior Director of the Bank's Energy and Extractives Global Practice - did we think achieving the universal access goal was possible in just a decade and a half?

The answer from every panelist was - yes, achieving universal access by 2030 will be possible, but not by relying only on the 20th century method of expanding traditional electricity grids.
We agreed that emerging decentralized technologies and business models are the only way to quickly universalize energy access to the 600 million Africans who currently lack it. While the quickest technologies that can be deployed, so-called solar home systems, offer lower levels of power than a grid, it has been shown that the majority of human development benefits from access to energy actually occur at a very low level of consumption per capita. This means that there are important arguments not to use a “grid or nothing” approach that would take decades, which we do not have, to deploy.

Source: Power for All campaign
The problem is not that we lack the technology or the methods, but rather that key development support institutions such as the World Bank and other development financiers are much better set up to support a small number of large infrastructure projects than they are to assist 7,000-20,000 thousand local energy enterprises needed to quickly universalize energy access via these lower-powered technologies.
Important movements such as the Power for All campaign of energy access-focused businesses and civil society, the U.S. government’s Power Africa partnership, and the UK government’s Energy Africa campaign are all working to create opportunities for such businesses to emerge and be supported, but one thing is agreed by all - the key is finance, and before real progress on universalizing energy access can be made, development banks, foundations and other concessional sources of finance must become major players in the energy access space. 
So what are we waiting for?

Well we first of all need to utilize the practical and analytical tools we already have to build energy access markets, because it is clear that energy projects are not enough. The world needs functioning markets for energy access services but we’re still mostly focusing on individual projects. This needs to change.
We simultaneously need to develop incentives within development financiers to fund smaller projects - perhaps that would be to build and support more project aggregators such as SunFunder or perhaps it is to build a fund for to support energy training institutions to ensure money already promised to energy access will be spent on companies that can deliver, because the 7,000-20,000 companies do not exist yet and will need trained workers to undertake this massive task.
The takeaway is that a huge proportion of big, efficient infrastructure finance needs to be replaced with more complicated, expensive, exploratory, support to lots of small players. This may seem inefficient at first, but will deliver the jobs and human development benefits that Africa’s large infrastructure investments of decades past have largely missed.
On this human development point, one last message is this: while we now have agreement that the GTF was necessary because measuring access simply via the number of new connections is inadequate, we still measure the success of businesses funded to deliver access largely on this same inadequate metric.
When looking at future investments in energy access, donors should consider supporting more holistic enterprises that explicitly aim to deliver not only connections and kilowatts, but community jobs, community services and productive technologies. These services will directly impact communities’ ability to pay for more energy and more services, which in turn, improves companies’ bottom lines and banks’ balance sheets. Win-win-win.
For governments serious about development but also serious about value for money, we need to be looking at these and other energy nexus issues more holistically. In the era of SDGs and a new climate agreement, we need to be thinking about how we can use small, “inefficient” investments to deliver big, efficient results.


Aaron Leopold

Global Energy Representative, Practical Action

March 04, 2016

Aaron, great point and well articulated.

Sarah Baird
March 04, 2016

Great article and a great call to action.
At Let There Be Light International (www. lettherebelightinternational.org) we are working to empower local stakeholders to assess lighting need among the extreme poor and to provide Pico lights to the most vulnerable in off-grid communities. We also hold broad local stakeholder electrification meetings to educate communities about distributed renewable and to build markets. Although we are a donor based civil society organisation, we see our role as key in addressing energy nexus issues in impoverished communities. We also are very purposeful about collecting follow-up usage data and are midway through an assessment of 750 Solar light recipients in Uganda. I'd love to continue the conversation. Shine On!
Sarah Baird
Founder and Executive Director
Let There Be Light International

March 06, 2016

Please also look into the opportunities the E U offers with their ElectriFI programme, geared towards off-grid solutions in Africa.

Andreas Lehner
March 06, 2016

Hi Aaron,
great article! Highlights very clear the issue of finance, which is why we are working on a solution here at TRINE (www.jointrine.com)

March 07, 2016

Could not agree more.

Frank van der Vleuten
March 07, 2016

Thanks. Good discussion. It is very difficult to provide direct support for innovation. Probably better to leave innovation to the real entrepreneurs out there and focus our support on creating the right enabling environment for market innovation to happen, by taking away market obstacles such as excessive taxation, restrictions in accessing capital, etc. The challenge is to keep an open eye for the "undercurrent" of innovations that really matters for the entrepreneurs in the field. These are notably different from the examples highlighted in "market trends".

Paul Riley
March 10, 2016

your comments reflect what we have found in Nepal and Kenya, even 20 Watts can make a big difference.
I have just applied for funding for an innovative PV system with battery storage whose cost is low enough to be affordable for most rural people. We should know in early June if successful.
Either way, can we keep in touch. (if not successful there may be other funding opportunities)
Here is one paper that explains some of the concept.

Riccardo Ridolfi
March 10, 2016

Very interesting piece. Exactly aligned with our strategy for rural development through delivery of mini-grid based PRODUCTIVE energy, together with a community-based business incubation program. Would love to discuss further.

Riccardo Ridolfi
March 10, 2016

Great piece. Perfectly aligned with our strategy for rural development through the delivery of sustainable PRODUCTIVE power via mini-grids. Would love to discuss further.

Major Model SP
April 16, 2016

Informative article, just what I was looking for.