Syndicate content

Lessons from OECD countries: mental health is critical for human capital development

Patricio V. Marquez's picture
October 11, 2018 - BALI, INDONESIA. 2018 IMF / World Bank Group Annual Meetings. Human Capital Summit 2018: A Global Call to Action. Photo: Grant Ellis / World Bank

At the World Bank Group (WBG)-International Monetary Fund Annual Meetings earlier this month in Bali, Indonesia, WBG President Dr. Jim Kim posed a critical question: “What will it take to promote economic growth and help lift people out of poverty everywhere in the world…How will they reach their ambitions in an increasingly complex world?”  

The key, President Kim noted, is for countries to make investments in people – ensuring that people accumulate the health, knowledge and skills needed to realize their full potential and that they can put those skills to use across the economy. In response, the WBG launched the Human Capital Project, an effort to accelerate scaled and smarter investments in people around the world, and a Human Capital Index to measure the current and potential productivity of a country’s people.
 
As the same time as the Bali Annual Meetings, we were in London at the Global Mental Health Ministerial Summit, hosted by the U.K. Government and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) with the support of the World Health Organization, making the case that investing in mental health is a critical but often overlooked investment in individual potential, human capital accumulation and economic success. Sadly, due to widespread global inaction, there is still limited or no access to integrated mental health services in most countries, which leaves mental health services under-resourced and creates a major problem for accessing appropriate care. Stigma and discrimination only compound the problem.
 
Yet this approach is myopic. A growing body of evidence shows that the social and economic losses related to unattended mental conditions, including substance use disorders, are staggering. In the world’s most advanced economies – the 36 OECD countries – mental ill health affects an estimated 20 percent of the working-age population at any time, and its direct and indirect economic costs are estimated to account for about 3.5 percent of gross domestic product (GDP), equivalent to US$1.7 billion in 2017.
 
In the wealthy OECD countries, which spend on average 9 percent of GDP on health care, the high economic cost associated with mental conditions is largely driven not by mental health care expenditure, but by lost productivity in the working-age population (see Figure 1). Indeed, people suffering from mental ill health are less productive at work, are more likely to be out sick from work and when they are out sick are more likely to be absent for a longer period. Around 30 to 40 percent of all sickness and disability caseloads in OECD countries are related to mental health problems, according to a 2015 OECD report.

Figure 1: Measures of productivity loss: Sickness absence incidence and duration and proportion of workers accomplishing less than they would like because of a health problem, 2010

Source: OECD (2012), Sick on the Job? Myths and Realities about Mental Health and Work.
 
While most people with a mental illness do work, people living with mild-to-moderate mental disorders, such as anxiety or depression, are twice as likely to become unemployed. Premature mortality is another tragic driver of lost human potential and productivity; in the typical OECD country, people with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia, for example, have a mortality rate 4 to 6 times higher than the general population.

To effectively tackle the lost human capital from mental health conditions, it is imperative that countries turn their attention to preventing and addressing mental health conditions earlier in the life course. The economic costs of mental ill health begin before individuals enter the workforce, as mental health problems typically have their onset in childhood or adolescence, accounting for the most significant disease burden amongst children and young people. However, often there isn’t appropriate care and treatment at this life stage, or it doesn’t occur right away. This can have a lasting impact, as children and young people with mental ill health are more likely to stop full-time education early and have poorer educational outcomes (see Figure 2).

Figure 2: Percentage of people who stopped full-time education before age 15, by severity of mental disorder, 2010


Source: OECD (2012), Sick on the Job? Myths and Realities about Mental Health and Work.

If countries want to improve their relative ranking in the WBG’s Human Capital Index, they must start investing seriously in integrated programs to promote mental well-being and prevent and treat mental ill health in communities, maternal and child health and nutrition programs, in schools, in their health systems, in prisons and in the workplace. It’s also value-for-money, as it is much more effective to take action while people are still in school or the workplace than wait until they have dropped out from schools, the labor market or fall into a revolving door of homelessness and incarceration.
 
There are examples of progress on this front. In 2015 employment and health ministers from the OECD countries signed up to show their support for an integrated policy approach, agreeing that more policies were needed to support the mental health of young people, develop an employment-oriented mental health care system, build better workplace policies with employer support mechanisms and incentives and make benefits and employment services fit for claimants with mental health problems. We need more of this. As we argued in London, an integrated, cross-sectoral approach, rather than intervention silos, is a must. Inaction on mental health cannot be a challenge for health systems to tackle alone -- communities, schools, employers and society as a whole must all be on board.


Related:
World Bank Group Global Mental Health 
Mental Health in OECD Countries

 

Comments

Submitted by Maeen on

We totally agree on all of the above. It is a great work and it really improves a lot for the short terms and in the long run as well.
Investing in the early ages gives a magnificent results on the beneficiaries and thei families, communities, countries and the globe. Besides, it is always the lowest in terms of costing and the return of that investment is the highest and communities and countries get to recover and grow faster.
My only comment is that we should also focus on promoting positive thinking and building social and community values.
We believe that will be and added value to everyone

Thank you
Maeen

Submitted by Roberto on

Great and very interesting arguments!
For us is a motivating text to work more and more in health promotion on this field.

Roberto Moretti
ATS Bergamo

Submitted by Stuart B Fisher on

Thank you, Patricio - much as mental health presents with multifaceted underlying factors, the path to improvement requires an integrated approach. The recently-launched UN Mental Health Strategy ("A Healthy Workforce for a Health World," see further https://www.unsystem.org/content/un-mental-health-and-well-being-strategy-may-2018) embraces exactly this attitude and perspective.

Submitted by Brian Davey on

Good article with compelling arguments, that should not only be directed outwards towards nations striving to improve population health, but also inwards for organizations, including the WBG, seeking to promote the health of the their staff. Kudos to the Secretary General of the United Nations for recognizing this through the recent launch of the UN Mental Health Strategy, recognizing the importance of mental health for staff working in the international system, and a beacon to guide stronger efforts in this direction by all IO's.

https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/speeches/2018-10-16/un-system-workplace-mental-health-and-well-being-strategy-remarks

Add new comment