Reaching the last mile in Latin America and the Caribbean: How to provide sustainable water supply and sanitation to Indigenous Peoples
This page in:
Extending the human right of access to water supply and sanitation (WSS) services to Indigenous Peoples represents the final step for many countries to reach universal coverage in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC). As the 7th Rural Water Supply Network Forum is underway in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire, we must remind ourselves what “inclusion” means in the WSS sector. Poverty levels among Indigenous Peoples are more than twice those found among other Latin Americans, and they are 10 to 25 percent less likely to have access to piped water and 26 percent less likely to have access to improved sanitation.
With dire consequences on health, productivity, and well-being, these access gaps also exemplify two shortcomings of past engagement with Indigenous Peoples in the WSS sector: Indigenous territories have often been overlooked, and, even where investments specifically target Indigenous Peoples, WSS service sustainability remains a large issue. Several barriers explain this: investors’ and service providers’ lack of understanding of Indigenous Peoples' unique social and cultural characteristics, limited engagement with Indigenous authorities and attention to their priorities and aspirations, and the remoteness and difficult access to many Indigenous communities, to name a few. More generally, we need a tailored approach that responds to these challenges through institutional development, partnership with Indigenous authorities, and local capacity building for WSS services management in order to overcome the existing system that incentivizes physical interventions in easily accessible areas with limited social accompaniment.
To effectively and permanently close this coverage gap,
The Toolkit “Water and Sanitation Services: Achieving Sustainable Outcomes with Indigenous Peoples in Latin America and the Caribbean” draws from field visits to 37 Indigenous communities and diverse voices in seven countries of Latin America. It provides concrete guidance, good practice examples and operational tools to guide stakeholder engagement processes, participatory strategies, and the selection and implementation of investments to promote sustainable outcomes with Indigenous Peoples along three guiding principles:
- Respect of Indigenous Peoples’ unique and valuable world views and forms of organization through their active involvement throughout the project cycle.
- Ownership by Indigenous Peoples over their WSS services developed through a demand-responsive approach to reflect a community’s commitment to define, implement, use and look after their WSS solutions.
- Sustainability in the provision of WSS services through specific, institutionalized mechanisms for operation and maintenance that reflect Indigenous Peoples' customs and norms, including tailored technical assistance and active beneficiary involvement.
For more practical guidance and operational tools to promote the inclusive delivery of sustainable WSS services to Indigenous Peoples in LAC, please refer the full publication of the Toolkit “Water and Sanitation Services: Achieving Sustainable Outcomes with Indigenous Peoples in Latin America and the Caribbean.” Also available in Spanish here.
I believe the first step for infrastructure is proper communications. Then they can organize an electrical grid to monitor and run pump houses.
I enjoyed reading your toolkit report.
Some populations indeed suffer lower levels of WASH access, in as much as they are either economically disadvantaged and/or excluded for party-political, ethnic, or other social factors domestically. I think the key is to what extent their voices are heard in local, regional, or national decision-making processes.
In addition to the (relatively obvious) economic barriers to WASH access, I definitely believe that there is a lot of value in mapping out the enabling (or disabling, sometimes.. frankly) institutional framework in each country.
This enabling environment has an effect on the success on each and every water/sanitation/hygiene project that is implemented in each and every context. With the low rates of WASH project sustainability 5-10 years after project end, one would think that paying attention to institutions might be a good idea eventually.
Is there a similar report across Sub-Saharan African countries that tries to map out some of the institutional landscape/country context in relation to excluded populations?