Published on Data Blog

Remittances to developing countries resilient in the recent crisis

This page in:

But crisis-related risks cloud outlook for remittances and migration

Migration

Recently published Migration and Remittances Factbook 2011 provides a snapshot of migration and remittances for all countries, regions, and income groups in the world. It is available online at www.worldbank.org/migration.

According to the Factbook 2011, remittances to developing countries were a resilient source of external financing during the recent global financial crisis, with recorded flows expected to reach $325 billion by the end of this year, up from $307 billion in 2009. Worldwide, remittance flows are expected to reach $440 billion by the end of this year. 

The World Bank estimates that, after recovering by the end of this year, recorded remittances to developing countries will rise further in 2011 and 2012, possibly exceeding $370 billion in two years’ time. 

Remittances are a vital source of financial support that directly increases the income of migrants’ families,” said Hans Timmer, director of development prospects at the World Bank. “Remittances lead to more investments in health, education, and small business. With better tracking of migration and remittance trends, policy makers can make informed decisions to protect and leverage this massive capital inflow which is triple the size of official aid flows,” Timmer said.

The top remittance sending countries in 2009 were the United States, Saudi Arabia, Switzerland, Russia, and Germany. Worldwide, the top recipient countries in 2010 are India, China, Mexico, the Philippines, and France. As a share of GDP, however, remittances are more significant for smaller countries—more than 25 percent in some countries.

While high-income countries remain the main source of remittances, migration between developing countries is larger than that from developing countries to high-income countries belonging to the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).

Regionally, there is significant variation across developing regions, with larger-than-expected falls in remittances to Europe and Central Asia , Latin America and the Caribbean, the Middle East and North Africa, and Sub-Saharan Africa regions in 2009.  Flows to South Asia in 2009 grew more than expected, and those to East Asia and Pacific rose modestly.

Dilip Ratha on 'Migration & Remittances Factbook 2011' from World Bank on Vimeo.

Remittances in 2008 and 2009 became even more of a lifeline to poor countries, given the massive decline in private capital flows sparked by the crisis,” said Dilip Ratha, manager of the migration and remittance unit at the World Bank. “ However, high unemployment is prompting many migrant-receiving countries to tighten immigration quotas, which would probably slow the growth of remittance flows. Also uncertain currency movements can have unpredictable effects on remittance flows,”  Ratha added.

In addition to crisis-related risks, there are major structural and regulatory changes in the global remittance market. Regulations to combat financial crime have become a roadblock to the adoption of new mobile money transfer technologies for cross-border remittances. There is urgent need to reassess regulations for remittances through mobile phones and mitigate the operational risks,” Ratha said.

According to the Factbook 2011, the top migrant destination country is the United States, followed by Russia, Germany, Saudi Arabia, and Canada. The top immigration countries relative to population are Qatar (87 percent), Monaco (72 percent), the United Arab Emirates (70 percent), Kuwait (69 percent), and Andorra (64 percent). Mexico–United States is expected to be the largest migration corridor in the world this year, followed by Russia–Ukraine, Ukraine–Russia, and Bangladesh–India.

For the full report and data tables including classification by region, income, fragile and small states, please visit www.worldbank.org/migration or interact with migration experts at blogs.worldbank.org/peoplemove/ or go.worldbank.org/QGUCPJTOR0.

Since 2009, Europe and Central Asia’s developing region excludes Poland which has been reclassified as a high-income country. The trends analysis accounts for the reclassification of Poland.

Table 1: Outlook for remittance flows to developing countries, 2011-12

 

2007

2008

2009

2010e

2011f

2012f

$ billion

 

 

  Developing countries

278

325

307

325

346

374

  East Asia and Pacific

71

85

86

91

98

106

  Europe and Central Asia

39

46

35

37

39

43

  Latin America and Caribbean

63

65

57

58

62

69

  Middle-East and North Africa

32

36

34

35

37

40

  South Asia

54

72

75

83

87

92

  Sub-Saharan Africa

19

21

21

21

22

24

 

 

 

  Low-income countries

17

22

22

24

26

29

  Middle-income countries

262

303

285

301

319

345

 

 

 

  World

385

443

416

440

464

499

 

 

 

Growth rate (%)

 

 

  Developing countries

22.8%

16.7%

-5.5%

6.0%

6.2%

8.1%

  East Asia and Pacific

23.7%

20.2%

0.3%

6.4%

7.2%

8.5%

  Europe and Central Asia

38.5%

16.5%

-22.7%

3.7%

6.5%

10.4%

  Latin America and Caribbean

6.9%

2.2%

-12.0%

2.0%

7.6%

10.0%

  Middle-East and North Africa

21.5%

11.8%

-6.3%

5.3%

4.5%

6.7%

  South Asia

27.1%

32.5%

4.5%

10.3%

5.1%

6.3%

  Sub-Saharan Africa

46.7%

14.9%

-3.7%

4.4%

4.5%

6.7%

 

 

 

  Low-income countries

27.6%

32.5%

2.4%

8.2%

8.7%

9.0%

  Middle-income countries

22.5%

15.7%

-6.0%

5.8%

6.0%

8.0%

 

 

 

  World

21.1%

15.1%

-6.1%

5.8%

5.4%

7.5%

e= estimate; f=forecast
Source:  World Bank staff estimates based on data from IMF Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook 2009 and data releases from central banks, national statistical agencies, and World Bank country desks. See www.worldbank.org/prospects/migrationandremittances for data definitions and the entire dataset.


1 Since 2009, Europe and Central Asia’s developing region excludes Poland which has been reclassified as a high-income country. The trends analysis accounts for the reclassification of Poland.


Join the Conversation

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly
Remaining characters: 1000