Container-based sanitation: one way to reach the last mile for sanitation services
This page in:
Cities are growing at unprecedented rates, with over two thirds of the world population projected to live in urban areas by 2050 (UN DESA 2018), and city governments struggle to keep up with the increasing demand for urban services, including sanitation. This unplanned growth and the resulting dense informal housing hinder the provision of such services. Burgeoning informal settlements are characterized by poor political representation and challenging physical and topographical conditions, such as inaccessibility, rocky soil, high water tables and periodic flooding, which make the provision of basic services especially difficult. Cities require sanitation approaches for such settings which can complement, or precede the arrival of, traditional sewers and conventional on-site solutions, and thus contribute to the realization of the sanitation-related Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This thinking underpins the core principles of Citywide Inclusive Sanitation (CWIS) – encouraging cities to think about a diversity of technical solutions that provide services along the whole sanitation service chain, combining different approaches to better respond to the challenging realities faced by cities.
Container-based sanitation (CBS) is one of the ways that such services can be provided. CBS consists of an end-to-end service – i.e. one provided along the entire sanitation service chain – which collects excreta hygienically from toilets designed with sealable, removable containers and which strives to ensure that the excreta is safely treated and disposed of or reused. For cities, this has major implications as it can help them shift their focus from exclusively building sanitation infrastructure to that of service delivery.
Where is CBS appropriate?Based on a review of four CBS service providers, the World Bank has identified the following emerging lessons:
- CBS approaches should be considered as part of a menu of CWIS options, particularly in hard-to-reach areas of cities.
- The introduction of CBS services could especially be considered for poor urban populations for whom alternative on-site or sewer-based sanitation services might not be appropriate.
- Adopting a conducive policy and regulatory environment could be an important first step for governments looking to foster CBS services in areas where they could be suitable.
- Recognizing the fact that CBS service providers will likely not be covering their full costs in the short- to medium-term, and that most urban sanitation services are subsidized, public authorities and/or water supply and sanitation service providers could explore ways to ensure that CBS services are sustainably financed.
CBS service providers have found a way to address the whole sanitation service chain. As the service providers continue to grow and adapt their activities, we have identified some opportunities for continued research:
- What constitutes a safe CBS service, and what are its essential features?
- How can CBS services be integrated within a broader menu of options for water supply and CWIS service provision?
- What lessons can we draw from CBS service provision and apply to the sector more broadly?
- How do CBS approaches compare financially and economically to other available sanitation alternatives?
- How can existing CBS service providers be supported to scale up service provision in existing service areas or to expand into new areas?
- How could performance-based contracts be designed for CBS service provision?
This week, we are also presenting the report and sharing the key finding at AfricaSan5/FSM5. Join our session at 2:30PM today in Meeting Room 2.4.1., Cape Town International Convention Center.
Felicitations for evaluating the CBS as an excellent alternative for the provision of sanitation services, especially for people living in high density low-income urban areas. There are still significant challenges to overcome such as: existing policies and regulations, in some cases; the lack of them in others; attaining efficient and hygienic operation of the systems; appropriate disposal; financial sustainability; etc. However, studies of this nature will facilitate policy dialogue with government officials and the dissemination and replication of best practices.
Very good solution with this CBS approach. I would like to implement it here in my country (Benin-West Africa).
The problem remains financing in such countries.