Syndicate content

New directions in the economics of agricultural water conservation

Susanne M. Scheierling's picture

A challenging area in agricultural water management is the assessment of policy and investment options in irrigated agriculture for conserving water and adapting to increasing water scarcity, in particular when the linkages to groundwater resources and their management are to be considered and incorporated. 

However, this is an increasingly important area of research for a number of reasons.  First, irrigated agriculture accounts for about 70% of global freshwater withdrawals, and is a major contributing factor to the water scarcity situation in many countries.  Second, with almost a quarter of freshwater withdrawals for irrigated agriculture being made up of groundwater supplies—corresponding to 70% of total groundwater withdrawals—, agricultural water use is also a major contributing factor to aquifer overexploitation.  And, third, surface water and groundwater are closely linked in most parts of the world, with groundwater discharge contributing to the base flow of streams and surface water contributing to groundwater recharge, and these interactions are intensified by human action, in particular water withdrawals for irrigated agriculture.  Even in cases where irrigated agriculture depends mostly on surface water, groundwater impacts therefore need to be accounted for when assessing water conservation efforts (and vice versa).

Several papers with new research on this topic were presented during the 11th Meeting of the International Water and Resource Economics Consortium (IWREC) hosted by the World Bank in Washington, DC in September 2014. Seven of these contributions, incorporating new directions in the economics of agricultural water conservation with a special consideration of the groundwater linkages, together with an outline, have recently been published as a special issue of Water Economics and Policy (Volume 2, 2016).
 
A range of options for conserving agricultural water and their relations to groundwater resources are considered in the seven papers.  This includes the conversion to more capital-intensive irrigation technologies, a popular and often subsidized intervention that increases the “efficiency” of irrigation water use on a field by reducing evaporation and “losses” from surface runoff or subsurface drainage.  Yet the effect of the intervention on water scarcity depends on the local context and the relative importance of the return flows for downstream uses, and thus requires careful assessments.  This also applies to the lining of leaky canals to achieve a higher conveyance efficiency.  Additional interventions considered include limiting the cropping area and restricting groundwater pumping.  Further explored are approaches for assessing whether such interventions, especially those aimed at increasing on-farm irrigation efficiency and/or conveyance efficiency, contribute to the widely emphasized need for improving agricultural water productivity. 
 
The seven papers incorporate the linkages of the policy and investment options to groundwater resources and their management in different ways.  These range from recognizing the importance of the linkages and emphasizing the need for offsetting any negative impacts, to integrating hydrologic models in the economic analysis for an estimation of likely impacts, and to specifying targets for groundwater levels or, in the case of a stream-aquifer system, standards for instream flows that need to be met by the interventions.
 
The papers examine different economic aspects, including:

  1. Factors influencing the rate and intensity of adoption of improved irrigation technologies (Wang et al.)
  2. Tradeoffs between different policy interventions in irrigated agriculture for reducing groundwater overdraft (Msangi and Cline)
  3. The usefulness of subsidies for canal lining when the value of seepage as a positive externality is incorporated (Schmidt and Taylor)
  4. The impact of subsidies for more capital-intensive irrigation technologies on groundwater use and depletions (Quintana Ashwell and Peterson)
  5. Effects of improvements in irrigation efficiency on water flows at the basin level (Contor and Taylor)
  6. The optimal design of restrictions on groundwater pumping in a stream-aquifer system with ecological standards for instream flow (Speir et al.)
  7. Approaches for explicitly including water aspects in economic measurements of agricultural productivity and efficiency (Scheierling et al.)
Research on the economics of agricultural water conservation, especially with the incorporation of linkages between conservation options and groundwater resources and their management, is an evolving field, and the seven papers make important contributions.  Growing availability of data—such as on the responses of irrigators to changes in water conditions or in the policy environment, and on the basin-wide interactions between surface water and groundwater—will allow the application of more advanced methods and improve the understanding of policy and investment options for conserving agricultural water and increasing its productivity.  More efforts will have to be undertaken to carry out context-specific assessments of potential interventions that go beyond the field- or project level, not least to avoid interventions with counterproductive effects that increase agricultural water use and negatively affect downstream uses.  Given the worsening water situation in many parts of the world, policy makers will need sound advice on policies and investments related to water use in irrigated agriculture. 

Related:  

Comments

Submitted by liaqat hayat on

recycling of wastewater can be also considered in this respect if some economical and viable treatment system like bioremediation can be put use to

Submitted by Ajit Jain on

At present all the traditional methods of irrigation, we irrigate our Land where as the requirement is to irrigate the Crop.
To effectively and efficiently use water, we should focus on irrigating the Crop, this is feasible only if we adopt Drip Irrigation Technology for Irrigation of Crops.
The Drip technology saves water up to 70% and one can even irrigate Rice using Drip, NO need of standing water to cultivate Rice. In this method of irrigation, one can easily achieve 90% plus Water Use Efficiency.
Apart from saving water, major benefits of Drip irrigation are doubles productivity, maintains soil health etc...
Drip technology needs to be promoted as It is sustainable.

Submitted by Xavier Salas on

I like what you said about having a water management plan -- I think that is extremely important. It is one thing to just have water, but it is another thing to be on top of it and know exactly what is going on. Thanks for all the advice! Do you have any tips of where to start with creating a plan? Thanks again! https://www.lakedoctors.com/services.php

Add new comment