![Dana Smilie](/content/dam/sites/blogs/img/detail/mgr/nina_blog_cover_photo_small.jpg)
Since 1997, there has been a six-fold increase in the number of women parliamentarians in Egypt, Jordan and Morocco; women’s share of seats has increased from 6 to 25 percent in Iraq. How has this been possible? All four countries have used quotas to boost women’s representation. Djibouti and Sudan have implemented similar programs; Tunisia and Yemen may as well.
Do quota systems conflict with the ideal of equal opportunity? Or is the equality of outcome more important? While the United States does not have quota systems, in France, women are guaranteed half of electoral candidates in political parties. Do quotas homogenize the variety of individual experiences of being a woman? Do they unintentionally reinforce a perception of subordination in their attempt to overcome inequalities?
![Nina Bhatt at launch of March 4](/content/dam/sites/blogs/img/detail/mgr/nina_blog_photo_1.jpg)
A strong signal for the future
If desire for quotas exists among local constituents and is heeded by the political elite, perhaps such reforms can have positive results. For example, some type of quota mechanism for improved representation of women in Yemen is likely to be an integral part of the upcoming National Dialogue. A more equitable distribution within parties and in office there would send a strong signal across the region about government’s willingness to be more inclusive in settling complex grievances. It would be based in recognition of the need for a different form of participation that includes everyone, not merely the entrenched interests. People in Yemen, and across the Middle East, are hoping that their demands are heard and acted on, soon.
Join the Conversation