Also available in: Español
Between 2010 and 2017, Chile was struck by 10 major natural hazard events. These disasters affected as many as 340,583 houses and cost $3.6 billion in reconstruction (Ministry of Housing and Urbanism of Chile). Post-disaster assessments point to housing as one of the most affected sectors in the wake of climate-related and other natural hazards—most commonly floods, earthquakes, landslides, and fires. In a 22-year period between 1990 and 2011, minimum losses in the housing sector for 16 countries in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) amounted to $53 billion.
In the LAC region, one quarter of the population lives in slums, characterized by the prevalence of substandard housing quality as well as incremental and self-construction of homes. Programs providing new housing do not always reach families in the lowest quintiles; and without access to affordable and well-located housing alternatives, households have no other option than to build informally, and in areas most prone to natural disasters.
Traditionally, housing policies and programs in LAC have promoted new housing construction and upfront subsidies for new home purchases by low-income families. While significant strides have been made to tackle the quantitative housing shortage, efforts to reduce the qualitative housing deficit have not reached the same scale and momentum. For instance, in Colombia, only 15% of the housing subsidy portfolio has targeted home improvements since 2003.
, especially for the poor? To address this issue, the World Bank Group organized a discussion on “Improving Housing Policies to Increase Affordability and Mitigate Climate and Disaster Risks” in Washington D.C. on March 22-23. The event gathered housing authorities from 14 countries, including Argentina, Belize, Chile, Colombia, Dominica, Guatemala, Grenada, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico, Paraguay, Peru, Saint Lucia, and the United States, as well as international experts from academia, the private sector, and NGOs.
Following two days of lively discussions, important opportunities for policymakers in the region were identified. These include:
- Aligning structural retrofitting efforts with better incentives for homeowners. Tying property formalization to structural retrofitting initiatives—whether to grant higher levels of legal security or to allow homeowners to make better economic use of their assets—may encourage residents living in informal housing to invest in retrofitting upgrades, provided that a combination of government subsidies and affordable loans is available for these purposes. Acting now makes economic sense—investing $1 in housing retrofitting saves $4 in reconstruction.
- Proactively engaging microfinance institutions to increase affordability and advance home resilience. A microfinance market must be properly incentivized to expand its services to low-income families, particularly in markets where beneficiaries are (already willingly) leveraging additional private resources, including out-of-pocket expenses. Currently, the share of home improvement loans in portfolios of microfinance institutions fluctuates between 20% and 30%.
- Linking housing policies to both affordability and energy efficiency. Housing policies for home improvements can leverage energy efficiency improvements to help reduce carbon emissions and keep global warming below the critical level of 2 degrees Celsius. Combining these objectives can also deliver significant savings in household energy costs and lead to other benefits such as better health conditions, particularly for women and children.
Let us know by posting a comment.
The 2017 Meeting of the LAC Housing Working Group was organized by the Social, Urban, Rural, and Resilience Global Practice, and sponsored by the Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR).
- Three misconceptions in the way of better housing policies
- Let’s build the infrastructure that no hurricane can erase
- How Latin America’s housing policies are changing the lives of urban families
- Retrofitting: A housing policy that saves lives
- The challenge of affordable housing for low-income city-dwellers