For many of us, the Syrian crisis brings to mind images of refugee families blocked at European borders and sprawling humanitarian camps. Yet the majority of those fleeing the violence have remained in cities inside Syria and in neighboring countries, in the hopes of reaching safety, and accessing better services and jobs.
The forced displacement crisis in the Middle East is also an urban crisis
Unlike in earlier times, the current forced displacement crises is predominantly an urban crisis . Across the Middle East - in particular Syria, Iraq, Jordan, and Lebanon - the sudden influx of massive populations has redefined the urban footprint in cities, placing immense stress on local infrastructure, services, housing, and economic opportunities.
The new face of forced displacement:
Most of the forcibly displaced live outside of camps: An estimated 80-90% of the forcibly displaced in the Middle East and North Africa region reside in towns and cities, compared to 60% globally, and up from 40% only a few years ago;
Forced displacement is projected to be long lasting: More than 80% of refugee crises last for ten years or more, and two in five last 20 years or more, which suggest a lasting impact on the urban footprint across the region;
Unequal distribution of refugees and Internally Displaced People (IDP): While large cities are the most affected if we look at absolute numbers, it is the impact in secondary cities and towns close to borders of conflict affected countries that is especially stark;
Those displaced by conflict tend to stay close to home: For each refugee displaced in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, there are almost five IDPs.
With the forcibly displaced no longer residing in segregated areas in camps but blending into existing urban populations, traditional programs targeting individuals based on their IDP or refugee status are no longer sufficient. In a constantly evolving urban and social fabric, where the location and needs of host and displaced communities are increasingly hard to distinguish, place-based policies have a central role to play.
Learning how to respond to forced displacement in increasingly urban environments
The World Bank’s urban and social team in MENA has begun to grapple with these issues in a policy note: ‘Cities of Refuge: Bringing an Urban Lens to the Forced Displacement Challenge.’ The policy note sheds light on the issue of forced displacement from the perspective of receiving towns and cities, and provides a basic framework of “how to think” about these issues:
Working with the forcibly displaced and host communities through integrated place-based approaches: Targeted assistance to the displaced should be complemented with place-based development approaches that build on existing national and local governance structures and service delivery mechanisms to better serve all residents.
Blending humanitarian response and development practice at the outset: In most settings, responses to urban forced displacement will need to begin with an emergency humanitarian response and then move to sustained engagement that promotes long term development; yet rather than succeed each other, humanitarian and development actors need to engage in complementary efforts for greater impact throughout the entire period of forced displacement (see figure below).
Interventions on the humanitarian—development nexus vary across different types of cities: Policy responses will need to vary based on the characteristics of receiving cities (depending on size, magnitude of displacement, existing infrastructure and services, and financial and administrative capacity), with a more humanitarian approach in cities caught up in acute violence and destruction, and a stronger development focus in for higher capacity cities that receive a relatively small number of refugees.
Finally, ‘Cities of Refuge’ is a call to action. The report proposes a menu of concrete policies for managing forced displacement with an urban lens. This entails reshaping the political dialogue around urban forced displacement - by expanding our focus beyond the forcibly displaced, and promoting the welfare of all residents, regardless of origin.
It was nice to read that World Bank has come out with the idea of "Crisis based Solution" rather than "Common Solution" for problems of forced migration. If UN and other agencies and Governments who are helping to ease such crisis take the clue from this article the solution offered will be long term solution and will use the aid effectively.
Hope to have similar more articles from your blog.
Shrikant Shah
India.
Prof. Dr. Siamak G. Shahneshin
January 09, 2018
Thank you Alex for your sharing.
The Cities of Refuge, needs more then the so-called „proven urban development approaches“. if you would allow me, I would like to share with you my modest-opinion after being around in this „industry“. I’d start with Albert Einstein, who stated “We can not solve our problems with the same level of thinking that created them” . “Sustainability” is usually defined as dry, dry, like a Swiss birchermüesli without fruit and milk, cream or yoghurt. In the shadow of the so-called Second Modernism, we have strayed. Where are we wrong? Sustainability, as currently being discussed, is usually an exercise in energy efficiency. We admit it or not, we have crafted a culture-bubble, and and built an environ-mental bubble; and the cities are not immune to this. We need to discard the injectional approach. The challenge today is to reflate the bubble before it bursts. To successfully meet the challenges of the 21st Century, academics and reflective-practitioners both acknowledge the need for an unorthodox, archetype model. For this, I do recommend transdisciplinary approach in thinking, management, and planning. Rather than stigmatising the parts, transdisciplinarly approaches merge the unmergeable; bridging the gap between heart and mind, cultures and people; bridging the gap between ecology and technology, nature and money, bridging the gap between politics and economy, bridging the gap between the seemingly contradictory goals like efficiency and resilience, collaboration and competition, and diversity and coherence. Transdisciplinarly approaches do create bridges where all the disciplines fail. Transdisciplinary approaches provide a more purposeful, long-term SustainAble goal for resilient cities, and affordable, ecological housing for human beings. I believe World Bank is in a position to make difference. There used to be in downtown New York a gallery running under the name "Time is always now". Whenever I hesitate, I think of this slogan; let us not lose our time. This is our call, your call.
Wish you a wonder-full 2018.
Best regards, Siamak
Colette Jacques
January 10, 2018
How can I know more about working with to help people in need in my area.
It was nice to read that World Bank has come out with the idea of "Crisis based Solution" rather than "Common Solution" for problems of forced migration. If UN and other agencies and Governments who are helping to ease such crisis take the clue from this article the solution offered will be long term solution and will use the aid effectively.
Hope to have similar more articles from your blog.
Shrikant Shah
India.
Thank you Alex for your sharing.
The Cities of Refuge, needs more then the so-called „proven urban development approaches“. if you would allow me, I would like to share with you my modest-opinion after being around in this „industry“. I’d start with Albert Einstein, who stated “We can not solve our problems with the same level of thinking that created them” . “Sustainability” is usually defined as dry, dry, like a Swiss birchermüesli without fruit and milk, cream or yoghurt. In the shadow of the so-called Second Modernism, we have strayed. Where are we wrong? Sustainability, as currently being discussed, is usually an exercise in energy efficiency. We admit it or not, we have crafted a culture-bubble, and and built an environ-mental bubble; and the cities are not immune to this. We need to discard the injectional approach. The challenge today is to reflate the bubble before it bursts. To successfully meet the challenges of the 21st Century, academics and reflective-practitioners both acknowledge the need for an unorthodox, archetype model. For this, I do recommend transdisciplinary approach in thinking, management, and planning. Rather than stigmatising the parts, transdisciplinarly approaches merge the unmergeable; bridging the gap between heart and mind, cultures and people; bridging the gap between ecology and technology, nature and money, bridging the gap between politics and economy, bridging the gap between the seemingly contradictory goals like efficiency and resilience, collaboration and competition, and diversity and coherence. Transdisciplinarly approaches do create bridges where all the disciplines fail. Transdisciplinary approaches provide a more purposeful, long-term SustainAble goal for resilient cities, and affordable, ecological housing for human beings. I believe World Bank is in a position to make difference. There used to be in downtown New York a gallery running under the name "Time is always now". Whenever I hesitate, I think of this slogan; let us not lose our time. This is our call, your call.
Wish you a wonder-full 2018.
Best regards, Siamak
How can I know more about working with to help people in need in my area.